Brett Favre by a landslide.
2007-11-21 12:28:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by bboyd123 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hasselbeck can still throw? Brett will out play Matt , but the Lions will make it hard for the Packs to get number 10.
2007-11-21 20:36:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by tzimmer44 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Brett Favre! You put Hasselbeck as the other choice? What were you thinking?
2007-11-21 20:34:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Brett even though I think they will run the ball some as well. But I don't think they are going to play Ryan Grant the full game because he is not 100% healthy and is questionable for tomorrows game.
Also just looking at he the match up, the packers really should throw the ball more in the end and run it more in the 1st half.
2007-11-21 20:34:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Reese 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Doesn't matter. The real question is who will complete more passes. (I love the Packers and Favre, but if Hasselbeck is "on," he will complete more passes when it counts).
Seattle does NOT have a real running game. They have attempted to provide one, but have ...to date ...fallen well short of any other team being overly concerned about it.
Seattle is an unusual team. They are capable of beating "the best," and then fall on their faces and loose to lesser teams.
I guess all this is what makes the game fun to watch!
Happy Thanksgiving, everyone!
2007-11-21 20:45:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hasselbeck
2007-11-21 20:29:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by David F 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Hasselbeck will attempt more passes...Holmgren's basically said that they have all but abandoned the running game. I don't know how successful he'll be, but he's going to throw the ball all over the field.
2007-11-21 21:09:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tut Uncommon 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
favre hasselbeck hurt
2007-11-21 20:34:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by paulcondo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Brett - #1
2007-11-21 20:35:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by LVloverNaNa 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Favre, they hardly run and the seahawks are more balanced. He's gonna have a 250+ yard game.
2007-11-21 20:29:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Erik 2
·
1⤊
0⤋