2007-11-21 11:55:57 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Oh, Give it up YumaScot!! If Bill Clinton were still president, oil wouldn't be anywhere near as high as it is now, Chinese or no Chinese, and you know it as well as I do!!
2007-11-21 12:11:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Is there anything Bush isn't blamed for?
I could keep coming up with White Water, China-gate, Travel-gate, Pardon-gate, rapes, Bimbo eruptions, Vince Foster...etc. etc.
Clinton had Bin Laden offered to him, yet refused to take him. He was known to be involved with the '93 WTC bombing, Kobar Towers, USS Cole, Somalia...etc, etc
Because of Clinton Communist China now has launch capability, to deliver the nukes.
If Clinton had taken any action, and stuck with it, the result would be similar to "It's a Wonderful Life".
Imagine if 9/11was shown as what would have been if Clinton hadn't acted so decisively; too bad that wasn't the case. It's a George Bailey in reverse.
Bad things happen when good men remain silent. Too bad Clinton isn't a good man, and too bad he remained silent as a little rodent.
2007-11-21 20:33:35 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Me 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually I thank the Democrats for switching us from an oil producer to a Country dependent on unstable foreign suppliers of oil. Now when we need to drill and develop our own resources where will the Liberals stand?
2007-11-21 20:12:12 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If I could buy the car that runs on air, I wouldn't blame a soul. BUT! As of now, these greedy people who run the world are destroying the world and pretty soon there won't be an earth to enjoy.
2007-11-21 20:21:13 · answer #4 · answered by freekin 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Economics 101 cut competition and prices will rise. Those who understand Bush and Republican ethics invested in oil and Halliburton seven years ago. Not to mention the KBR shares that have doubled since they spun off from Halliburton two years ago. Now we see something about bad loans and real estate....anyone seen Neil around?
2007-11-21 20:18:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Funny how the DEMS..like the LBJ family and the head of the Democratic party are HEAVILY invested in these oil companies....but only the GOP make money off it......at least that is what the Dems hope you believe...and they keep telling you over and over with money they get from China
2007-11-21 20:02:55 · answer #6 · answered by Try Reality 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The President has absolutely no control over the cost of Oil or anything else.
2007-11-21 20:00:10 · answer #7 · answered by prancinglion 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hillary and Nancy P promised lower gas prices. Where waiting ladies
2007-11-21 20:00:23 · answer #8 · answered by 1st Buzie 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If we would drill in the US, we would have a vast amount of oil at a reasonable cost, but the Lib's wont let us: the tree lovers have them in their pocket.
Hillary wants to tax big oils profits!!?? THAT would be paid by us to cover their loss...shes stupid.
2007-11-21 20:02:40 · answer #9 · answered by BARRY BALLOON KNOT 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
So much for the ballyhood lib theory that the war was for oil.
If we ruled Kuwait and Iraq, we wouldnt need to buy oil at all.
pracing, your absolutely right. Bush has no control...over ANYTHING, even his administration. Michael Moron too!
2007-11-21 20:01:24 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋