Sounds like you are more concerned than any Con is.
2007-11-21 11:27:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Voice of Reason 7
·
2⤊
5⤋
I think a lot of people on Y/A are obsessed with who is or is not gay because questions like this keep coming up.
2007-11-21 11:34:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by hdean45 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I surely have wondered about this oftentimes, both right here at Y/A, and in severe conversations with different 'political junkies'. I kinda laughed even as Hillary observed as them a "huge top-Wing conspiracy", yet then later observed the degree, and fanaticism, of their hatred, and idea she observed as it like it changed into. i imagine it is because he paid down the deficit, decreased authorities bureaucracies, and workplace artwork, and fantastically a lot ended welfare-as-we-knew-it. All were longtime Republican speaking-factors, and conservative concerns,...yet they not in any respect did a element about those complications, except communicate ! In different words, he beat them at their personal sport, and that is of route unforgivable ? Edit: placed up Script; Re: Oliver North. in the course of Ollie's senate hearings,( for Iran-Contra scandal),he reported that he needed further secret service protection, and a $10,000 dollar alarm gadget at his domicile, "because a very undesirable guy has threatened to kill me and my kin, and that i trust him". even as the Senator from Tennessee requested him who this Very undesirable guy changed into? Ollie stated "Usama Bin encumbered". So, making huge Al attentive to who the pinnacle terrorist changed into, is about the purely solid element Colonel North ever did for US.
2016-10-24 21:32:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, because I am tried of "he had foresight", and he was a "diplomat" etc...
1. He had the foresight to not seriously go after al queda and the taliban that led to 9/11.
2. He had the foresight to cut intelligence gathering capabilities with sever CIA and military budget cuts that helped led to 9/11
3. He helped North Korea develop nukes with US tax dollars by providing billions in aid to not build a nuke but the treaty did not have the proper oversight to ensure they were being honest
4. He helped promote corporate scandals by cutting SEC budgets
5. The list could go on.......
2007-11-21 11:28:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
If a Washington (beltway) insider is telling the truth, Dick Cheney and Bill Clinton are getting it on. However, William Jefferson Clinton is a big "bush" fan and that's not G.W.!
2007-11-21 11:34:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by john c 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
No I don't know, or care about any of those things. But it does seem that you have a problem. Maybe they like Bill Clinton because they know he is one of them. (A CON) Or should be among them.
2007-11-21 11:28:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Glenn T 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
You have to pardon the wiz....he is just unhappy that they aren't members of the Democratic ORG NAMBLA...trying to legalize child rape
At least when a GOP is caught the others want him imprisoned...the Dems caught...AL LA Jefferson stay in congress...but there are to many of those to name....
2007-11-21 12:40:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Try Reality 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why is it that when lib's really want to insult someone they call them gay? I mean really, think about it.
2007-11-21 11:29:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Michael 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I find it fascinating that liberals are so intolerant. I don't care whether a person is, or is not gay.
2007-11-21 11:25:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by gcbtrading 7
·
4⤊
4⤋
I don't know about that, but they do seem to have an unhealthy obsession with him, that's for sure.
2007-11-21 11:23:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by crushinator01 5
·
4⤊
4⤋