it basically shows the heart of the problem... they don't really care about learning about others or understanding the situation...
they only want to mudsling and generalize extremist positions on the majority, which they think makes them look "centrist" in comparison...
2007-11-21 10:11:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Wow, when did the shrill and ignorant get their own encyclepedia? It's not something to be taken seriously. And, I agree with Think 1st, it's very childish.
2007-11-21 18:08:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
It makes them look like a joke website thats not to be taken seriously.
Well, even more so :P
2007-11-21 18:07:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by justin_I 4
·
6⤊
2⤋
I think it's funny that there is such a thing as "conservapedia".
2007-11-21 18:08:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Fretless 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
It isn't much of a definition but it is factually accurate.
2007-11-21 18:17:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Draper 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
It makes them look like what they are...a joke.
2007-11-21 18:08:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
This is satire.
2007-11-21 18:09:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
It's an honest accurate definition.
thanks for the link.
2007-11-21 18:08:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
8⤋
It is rather childish.
2007-11-21 18:07:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Think 1st 7
·
5⤊
2⤋