Lots of people answered Al-Maghrebi's question, but then he took it off the the Yahoo Answers board. So I'm re-posting it for further discussion. By the way, Al-Maghrebi means "the Maghrebian" in Arabic -- it's an adjective. The writer is saying that he is from the Maghreb region, which includes Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia.
I'll post my answer to his question below and then all you kids can chime in.
2007-11-21
09:57:18
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
They are both brave, if we're assuming that they are attacking legitimate military targets.
The Japanese Kamikaze of WWII, for example, and the attack on the USS Cole, are brave suicide operations. (I'm not a big fan of attacks on my country, though -- but the bombers were brave nonetheless).
Now, the stealth bomber is brave too. Flying behind enemy lines with just enough fuel for the mission. The weather, a mechanical malfunction or a well aimed enemy shot can bring your plane down. And if you survive the bail out, will your captors treat you well? Or will they burn you and drag your body through the streets? And if you return to base without a scratch, you've got to fly another mission all over again.
Of course, most suicide bomb missions in recent history have been against civilians at weddings in Jordan, on trains in Europe, in lines for jobs in Iraq, and even office workers in high-rise buildings. Those attacks are cheap shots -- against defenseless, unsuspecting victims.
2007-11-21
09:58:53 ·
update #1
I wish the suicide bombers would redeem themselves and try their luck against a nice, M1-A1 main battle tank.
But that's the problem, isn't it?
2007-11-21
09:59:17 ·
update #2