No, she should be in prison:
Conveniently Forgotten Facts. -- Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers
decided that a fellow black panther named Alex Rackley needed to die.
Rackley was suspected of disloyalty. Rackley was first tied to a chair.
Once safely immobilized, his friends tortured him for hours by, among
other things, pouring boiling water on him. When they got tired of torturing
Rackley, Black Panther member, Warren Kimbo took Rackley outside and put
a bullet in his head. Rackley's body was later found floating in a river
about 25 miles north of New Haven Connecticut.
Perhaps at this point you're curious as to what happened to these Black
Panthers? In 1977, that's only eight years later, only one of the
Killers was still in jail. The shooter,Warren Kimbro, managed to get a
scholarship to Harvard and became good friends with none other than Al Gore. He
later became an assistant dean at an eastern Connecticut State College. Isn't
that something? As a '60s radical you can pump a bullet into someone's
head and a few years later, in the same state, you can become an assistant
College dean! Only in America !
Erica Huggins was the woman who served the Panthers by boiling the water
for Mr. Rackley's torture. Some years later Ms. Huggins was elected to a
California School Board.
How in the world do you think these killers got off so easy? Maybe it
was in some part due to the efforts of two people who came to the defense of
the Panthers. These two people actually went so far as to shut down Yale
University with demonstrations in defense of the accused Black Panthers
during their trial. One of these people was none other than Bill Lan
Lee.
Mr. Lee, or Mr. Lan Lee, as the case may be, isn't a college dean. He is
not a member of a California School Board. He is now head of the United
States Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, appointed by none
other than Bill Clinton.
O.K., so who was the other Panther defender? Is this other notable
Panther defender now a school board member? Is this other Panther apologist now
an assistant college dean? No, neither!
The other Panther defender was, like Lee, a radical law student at Yale
University at the time. She is now known as the "smartest woman in the
world." She is none other than the Democratic Senator from the state of
New York ----our former First Lady, the incredible Hillary Rodham
Clinton .
This is proven right by both SNOPES.COM, and TruthorFiction.com
2007-11-21 07:44:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I asked this same question just two days ago and one avatar actually had over 40 different site on why she shouldn't. The main one is that she is against illegal and legal immigration, but is for taxing the poor illegals they work in her yard. The horror!
They also mentioned that she has no experience and they gov. Robertson has more experience than her and Obama and that his status trumps theirs.
Also all o fthe staged questions are getting a little old and in fairness to the other people i know money can buy CNN, but please ask the other questions . i have still not made up my mind, but for the democrats it is obvious that Dennis K or Biden would be able to be true liberal democrats and don't have as much money coming in as he two Jr. senators and one of them is at the top with over $450,000 and I will not tell you her name.
Also the way she will not "stand by her man" rally upset many women.
2007-11-21 08:10:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by R J 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
She's NOT the top of the list because she has some less than desirable funding sources, but such a VAST STEP up from the present illegal White House occupation... with the added bonus of articulation AND smarts!!!
2007-11-21 07:59:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think of that there might desire to be no question to whether or no longer a woman president, black president, asian president, hispanic president, non-christian president, gay president, or the different "form" of president might desire to be perfect on the modern time. Any American who judges a guy or woman's qualifications via ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation might desire to remember what usa is meant to stand for and reevaluate their point of patriotism. because of the fact to do it is to spit on the form and each thing that people who got here earlier us have fought for. it is all approximately freedom... as far as Hillary for president is going, i desire that our usa wakes up and realizes that putting the Clintons, who've verified their ties to the corporate interest device of politics, returned in the White domicile, won't deliver approximately the subject of the variations that are necessary as a fashion to counteract the downward spiral wherein we are at the instant headed. I additionally think of she seems too headstrong with reference to distant places coverage and could merely lead us right into a war with Iran. Terrorism is a actual danger, yet we would desire to consistently determine that our leaders will basically take us to war if there's a extreme danger to usa, and not because of the fact of political or economic incentives. Hillary Clinton is a huge flesh presser, she is acquainted with what to declare and what to no longer say, and he or she has numerous journey in campaigning, so she's been in a position to get help from numerous important figures. that does no longer mean she is the ultimate for our usa. I additionally locate the "all people would be greater advantageous than Bush" physique of techniques to be extremely risky. I agree, yet we would desire to consistently no longer basically settle for what comes because of the fact it's going to greater advantageous than what we've or vote in accordance with a desire to be sure the 1st woman president . we would desire to consistently take issues very heavily suitable now and %. the ultimate candidate to alter our democratic device and our muscle flexing, mightier-than-thou physique of techniques to distant places coverage because of the fact right here few presidencies are going to have a profound impact on the state of the international and our place in it.
2016-11-12 08:18:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am for Hillary because she is not only brilliant, but will unite the congress. She will definitely get us out of Iraq because the only reason we are still there is because Bush is Republican and non of the Republican congressmen want to challenge for fear that it will hurt them come election time. A major plus is she will get Bill to be a work delegate for us and restore our good name. Bill has already done some outstanding work with foreign countries in crisis, jut ask Bush Sr. And also Hilary may get advice from Carter. Carter brought peace between Israel and Egypt. So he would be a great asset for helping Bill in the Middle East.
2007-11-21 07:52:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Michael M 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
no. she has provend she is vindictive, a socialist and the ultimate politician, and i mean that in the worse possible way. she will do anything to attain her goals, legal or not, it matters not to her. i do think she will win the nomination of the Dem's but i also think they gloves will come off and so many of those 'secret' documents they have failed to release will be made public for all the see her guile and willingness to circumvent the laws that get in her way.
2007-11-21 08:39:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am a Democrat and while I support the idea of the first woman president, I'm not sure it should be Hilary. I just don't trust her.
2007-11-21 07:36:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Raymond 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think she should get run over by a bus. Twice.
2007-11-21 08:22:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by jetcityradio 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. 8 years of her in the WH is far too long already.
2007-11-21 07:35:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by infidel-louie 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
no. she would be slightly better than bush. but that doesn't say much. she votes with bush on nearly every issue. i can't see much difference. she's pretty much a neo-con and america has morphed into a one party system.
2007-11-21 07:48:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by trumph 3
·
1⤊
1⤋