Google Facts about chicken pox.
2007-11-21 07:12:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
My aunt had a newborn when she got chickenpox for the 2nd time. He didn't get it and she wasn't even breastfeeding. I think you are best to continue to breastfeed unless you have sores near your nipples. Your baby is already exposed and will benefit, at least some, from your antibodies. However, don't take it from me. Go to the La Leche League site and check it out. They have FAR MORE knowledge and certainly more than your doctor as most doctors have little or no training in breastfeeding.
2007-11-21 07:54:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by CarbonDated 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
When my son was 4 weeks old, my daughter came down with chickenpox. We were breastfeeding, and the ped was very reassuring to us, he told me that the baby had already been exposed to it, so there was nothing to do but keep breastfeeding. He predicted that the baby would get a very light case.
2 weeks after my daughter's chickenpox healed, my son started breaking out. Fortunately, he didn't get very sick with them. He did break out in lots and LOTS of blisters, but he didn't get terribly sick.
My ped and the Docs I work with always recommend that a breastfeeding mom continues to breastfeed, because the baby is A) Already exposed to whatever bug mom has, and B) the breastmilk has the antibodies in it that mom is making to fight off the infection, which will give the little one a bigger advantage than taking him off the breast.
Keep nursing!
2007-11-21 07:41:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by nightynightnurse 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
The incubation period—the time from exposure to the chicken pox virus until you develop symptoms—is usually 14 to 16 days but can be from 10 to 21 days. Chicken pox is most contagious from 2 to 3 days before the rash develops until all the blisters have crusted over.
since your baby has been exposed to you this whole time, she is gonna get them and you will see the signs and symptoms soon, since she is gonna get them i would say breast feeding isnt gonna make much of a difference but im not a doctor, why not breast pump into a bottle and have someone else feed her. im shocked you have never had them before as a child. at least now you dont have to worry about baby getting them when she is older since it would be much more uncomfortable for her.
2007-11-21 07:20:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by louie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is your dad incapacitated to the place he can't come see you? have you ever seen this selection if he's totally waiting to holiday? perchance chop up the fee. I permit you already know why: travelling with a small new child isn't simple. exceedingly if he's a colicky, fussy toddler. it relatively is genuine (maximum) of them like vehicle rides (mine hated being strapped in carseat), yet they consume each and every 2-3 hours, poop off-sync (so a consume supply up will possibly no longer coincide with a diaper replace supply up), choose to be entertain each and every 2nd of their waking time. evaluate this: feeding a new child in a curled place (carseat), and not enable them to stretch (arise, held up) to permit the food to flow down via their digestive tract, will reason bloated tummy and cramps. i could advise take shorter attempt-drives (a million-hr) and notice which one in each and every of your passengers are as much as the activity. apart from, can't the holiday be postponed for a whilst until eventually the toddler gets older (actual get previous summer season warmth) and the canine accustomed greater to the toddler too? (by making use of Easter, he were 2nd banana -to the toddler- for under 8 weeks). And travelling in close quarters for 8 hrs isn't simple element. people and animals want stretching. Is it worth 8hrpersistent for 4 days stay? is this holiday fairly a might desire to?, evaluate those issues, questioning the WORST of travelling with such youthful passengers - and be stunned if it seems much less confusing then you certainly anticipated, fairly than going into this questioning (being instructed) that's piece of cake and later freak out and pull hair because you lose administration over the region (toddler fussy and crying 4 hrs out 8, canine constantly yelping, sanitizing your hand and toddler bottles, food on the line, warming bottles, commonplace stops which will make the holiday 10hr long or different mishaps. sturdy success.
2016-09-29 23:09:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your baby has already been exposed to chickenpox, so not getting close to her is pointless and likely to cause her stress. Continuing to nurse her will provide her with some protection from the antibodies in your milk.
2007-11-21 07:14:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by daa 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
your paediatrician has the answer
your Dr is an idiot.
continue breastfeeding.
2007-11-22 04:39:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even though she has been exposed does not mean she will catch it..You might get lucky and her not! Lets pray! I would avoid any skin comtact with her until your scabby and your doc says its okay. Dont take any chances. Even though they say its better the younger they are but still...Why risk giving it to her if she may not contract it? Good luck!
2007-11-21 07:17:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Momma 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
well you better have alot of help in the house then... ohh my. lt would be best lf you have a mom or sister or anyone in the house to help out
2007-11-21 07:12:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
you should stop breastfeeding her.have someone to stay with you as long as you remain sick.you could also wear a mask like the ones that docs use when you come near the baby.take care
2007-11-21 07:20:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by alexia 5
·
0⤊
3⤋