What I mean is if I were able to go back to 1812 would Andrew Jackson still be alive? Depending on the answers I get I will have more arguments for them. I also confess I have discussed this with friends so I will have some quick answers. Also in our discussion we did not come to any sort of conclusion. What do you think?
2007-11-21 06:58:15 · 6 answers · asked by ehnvcjv 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Time travel is happening, but as soon as anyone trys to change the future there is an action by the Time Lords who will take two cups of flour, on cup of milk and two eggs with a pinch of salt. Mix, but do not over mix while riding a pony. This reminds me of the time, time, odd that should mean something to me. Time, huh, anyway, after sell the pony to friends, try and take a nap....
2007-11-21 07:08:56 · answer #1 · answered by Songbyrd JPA ✡ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If time travel were possible, then theoretically, yes, the people would be alive. The point in time and space where they existed is a definite plot in space-time. Nothing can change that. However, you might, by going back in time, alter events enough where you would no longer be alive. Something to think about before you fire up the flux capacitor.
2007-11-21 07:03:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's one of those big IFS... Like, if my mother had wheels, would she be an automobile?
IF time travel were possible, then we could also say that people would still be alive... considering you were actually going back in time.
On the other -serious - hand, if time travel WERE possible.... and those people WERE, in fact alive.... YOU would cease to exist somewhere in those travels.... I think that if "things" followed the same cycle of time, then YOU also, being one of those things, would also reverse in age.
I don't believe time travel is possible... but if it were, the time travelers would also be affected.
**EDIT**
The way I heard the tree in the forest thing is this: If a man speaks in the forest, and there's no woman there to hear him, is he still wrong?
2007-11-21 07:05:34 · answer #3 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That sort of depends...If you were to go back to, say Andrew Jackson's time, who's to say someone else might not have gone back before and caused something to happen to his father or mother, causing him to never have been born? or to have, say, accidentally caused his death at a young age? or...parallell universes... AAAUUUGGGHHH!!!
If a tree falls in the forest, and no one hears the crash... did it make any noise?
2007-11-21 07:10:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am guessing that you mean Andrew Jackson 1767-1845
and I guess that he would be--why do I feel that you know something I don't
2007-11-21 07:05:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
time is an enigma it's fully ficticious. suppose approximately it what does the clock inform you it is a distinct time proper? however that is most effective in relatio to subject and the roatation and revloution of the earth is how we calculate ficticious time. however there's no such factor as time in a way most effective development of subject
2016-09-05 11:13:07 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋