Many Democrats Cite The 9/11 Commision For Proofs And Facts . .. . . O-K , Then What Do You Think About This ?

Question

The 9/11 Commission stated that President Bush did NOT lie about WMD's . Check it yourself .
So why are there so many confused, distorted, and misled people who believe otherwise ? Could it be those people are lemmings for biased/lying media outlets ?
While awaiting trial , Saddam Hussein said that he himself lied about WMD's to frighten the USA and the rest of his adversaries . A gross miscalculation at the very least . However there are also reports now surfacing that when Israel bombed that nuke site in Syria recently that several of the components were from Iraq and had been smuggled across the border in the early days of the war .

But back to the point - If you ever give credence to the 9/11 Commission Report then logic dictates that you also believe the 9/11 Commission when they say President Bush did NOT lie about WMD's .

So. ... . Do You Believe the 9/11 Commission Report or not ?
And if not , then who and what the heck do you believe ?

Answer 1

Can you cite which page this is on? BTW here is the report for your reference. If you cannot cite the page, I will just assume you are making it up.

http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf

Answer 2

Careful here you might make some liberal heads explode. Facts are not what liberals deal in. They deal in emotions and how things make them feel. Perception means more to them than evidence. It doesn't matter that most of the world believed Hussein had these weapons. It also doesn't matter that it is a proved fact that he not only possessed these weapons, but also used them against the Iranians and the Kurds. These realities do not fit the Bush bad motto and therefore will be wholly ignored, or discredited by any means possible. You know I don't care if people like Bush or not and frankly I have my own dislikes of the man. I just wish we could have some honesty in the debate, but it will never happen when irrationality and denial rule the mindset of the detractors.

Answer 3

I don't believe I've ever agreed with Think1st before, but he's right! KUDOS!
People tend to QUOTE a document and then when it says something that they disagree with, they try to discredit the very same document they were just quoting.
It happens on both sides.
How many people blame all these things on the Patriot Act, never having read but a small part of it, then they try to reverse direction when you quote another part that challenges their view?
How many people quote An Inconvenient Truth about Global Warming then try to backpedal when inaccuracies are brought up in the film?

KUDOS to Think1st, he nailed this one on the money.
People are cherrypicking... and it's rampant.

Answer 4

A group of college students working over the course of a semester could have done a better job than the Commission did and anyone who quotes from it is an outright idiot.

Answer 5

don't be fooled through this. Obama did no longer "take" his fellow Senators. This holiday grew to become into paid for through the U. S. taxpayer. The accompanying Democratic and Republican Senators have been alongside because of the fact this grew to become right into a Senate holiday to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Europe. This grew to become right into a Senate holiday which has been grew to become right into a Obama campaign holiday to the two conflict zones and Europe. This grew to become into no longer an attempt through Barack Obama to attain out for bipartisan help with the two Democrats and Republicans.

Answer 6

Problem is the democrats will never admit this and because of their hate for the President probably will come up with some conspiracy theory on why the Commission said this.

Answer 7

Lib's are narcissist they only use what they want.
Nancy Garelic was on it and she put the wall up under Clinton and should have been on the other side of the commission.
For not allowing the Intel community to share info.

Answer 8

Bush was talking about mushroom clouds and everything else. I don't need to reference any report. I watched him on television myself. The intelligence person he chose to believe was proven to be a total fraud and his word was taken over CIA reports. Why?

There are still investigations going on. The 911 report is not the final say in the Iraq invasion.

Answer 9

I think that people, regardless of ideology tend to cherry pick information that agrees with their point of view.
It has also been shown that the intelligence on Iraq had been filtered this way.
Liberals,conservatives, and moderates as well, tend to publicize the information that supports their own agenda.

Answer 10

Dr. David Ray Griffin spells out why the 9/11 Commission report isn't worth the paper it was printed on:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMUuHIuWtoU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH-qQbxRTds&feature=related