If a laboratory were on fire and a baby sat next to a tank holding dozens of frozen embryos and you could save only one, which would you choose?
2007-11-21 05:00:50 · 4 answers · asked by wolf1ibm 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Since the embryos are frozen, they stand a chance of surviving if the electronics don't break down. The baby could not, both because he/she could be burned, but also due to smoke inhalation...Therefore the baby.
Hah...Good one paige!
2007-11-21 05:14:54 · answer #1 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1) Myself
2) Baby
3) Frozen Embryos
2007-11-24 05:05:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
luckily, i know from experience i can do more than people who cannot phrase a correct analogy to a moral debate can imagine can be done... so i save both, if i have an understanding of the importance of the embryos to future research and know what they are, which is as unlikely as a baby just hanging out in a lab, unattended and waiting on a fire.
But i am sure we are all proud of those people on here who have donated their brains to science, prior to death.
2007-11-21 05:24:07 · answer #3 · answered by paigespirate 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why trivialize a good question by following up with a dumb one? It's the Pope at work again! Why does he not do something to help the 26000 children who die each and day as a result of poverty.
2007-11-21 08:03:01 · answer #4 · answered by johnandeileen2000 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋