How far should we extend care or caring about others? Self? family? family and friends? a bigger group? All Americans? All humans? all life? all?
2007-11-21 02:25:40 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
What does this have to do with Americans? Well for example, we are at war because someone care enough to think it was necesary, we have welfare programs because someone care enough, we are debating health care because some care enough.
2007-11-21 02:41:24 · update #1
What does this have to do with Americans? As human beings, we should care mostly about ourselves - and respect and tolerate others.
2007-11-21 02:33:40 · answer #1 · answered by lecloakgenie 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If someone needs shortterm help fine, but we have gotten into the habit of supporting every low morals ho that squats out a kid. If I didn't get to make the baby, why the hell should I have to pay to raise the baby. I also think that after 1 kid, the poor need to be fixed so they never have kids again.
2007-11-21 10:49:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Far enough to spend the two tenths of one per cent of our gross national product it would cost to eradicate mass starvation and health issues from drinking polluted water that is currently causing one in five human deaths, mostly children. http://borgenproject.org
2007-11-21 10:35:18 · answer #3 · answered by robert c 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is up to the individual. Some people want to help. Others do not. That is the way it should be.
2007-11-21 10:39:28 · answer #4 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think we should take care of our family. if everyone did that we would not need welfare. the ones that dont take care of their own is not my problem or anyone elses.
2007-11-21 11:23:43 · answer #5 · answered by MIKE G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I care for all Americans, but that does not correlate to I want to support them all.
2007-11-21 10:29:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋