I agree,lets start right now,with Bush and take it from there. Of course Clinton is just as bad as Bush,but we have to start somewhere. GET MADhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7KHUbuhgpQ
2007-11-21 02:36:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by lalalalaconnectthedots 5
·
4⤊
2⤋
Yes. Let's start a revolution from behind our computer screens.
Honestly though, the "neocons" are already busy blaming Hillary for the bad job she's supposedly going to do... or, as seen above, still busy blaming Bill for what he had done to him.
There's something wrong with this question, even though I despise Bush as much as the next liberally-oriented thinker. And what's wrong with it is that it's virtually the same tone against Bush that we're already seeing against Hillary and that we're still seeing against Bill. We focus on the bad guy so much that we lose credibility. Whine whine whine, from both sides.
2007-11-21 02:27:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Buying is Voting 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
It is a pretty well known rumor that McLellan is a closet homosexual. He was hand chosen for that role because he is compromised like so many of the homosexual Republican elite. It's no surprise now that he's now coming out and attacking. It's not easy having to get on tv and lie everyday because you don't want to be outed. I now have an ounce of respect for him.
2007-11-21 02:46:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
I like the reference to the Illuminati. Interesting research shows all the other little groups interwoven with this one, and hence, we have the 'new world order'. It is more like the new world 'odor' and it doesn't smell very good.
2007-11-21 02:31:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by commonsense 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
Wow. And here I thought that all the dangerously insane and paranoid people were in institutions somewhere.
Unless they have given them internet access, I was wrong.
This question proves that the old adage 'there's no such thing as a stupid question' is wrong.
I'm terribly sorry you're so deranged... but seek help before you try to act upon any of your fantasies.
2007-11-21 02:45:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bryan~ Unapologetic Conservative 3
·
2⤊
4⤋
Thanks for the laugh you little whimpering liberal. "Scotty" himself said Bush did nothing wrong as far as he knows, yet you twist his words and msake up stupid lies to try to support your treasonous fallacies. As for your "revolution", what kind of spitballs will you be shooting at your 3rd grade teacher?
2007-11-21 06:44:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
starting impeachment hearings in the late summer and dragging them out until after the elections would be priceless
2007-11-21 02:27:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Neocons tend to avoid any truth that portrays them in a bad lighting.
and They prefer the bad lighting of public restrooms.
2007-11-21 02:26:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
9⤊
4⤋
The guy is just trying to deflect his stuff on Bush, since he knows the low IQ left will eat it up, why not use it. It must work, you fell for it.
2007-11-21 02:52:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
Same reason why you libs think the Clinton's (both of them) past isn't a big deal and shouldn't matter. Even though it does.
2007-11-21 02:26:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by baby1 5
·
6⤊
8⤋