Where you get fabricated news reports.
2007-11-21 02:24:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by alecs 5
·
2⤊
5⤋
SUED for the RIGHT TO LIE !!!
During their appeal, FOX asserted that there are no written rules against distorting news in the media. They argued that, under the First Amendment, broadcasters have the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on public airwaves.
The Right to Lie in the "News"
If ever we needed to know why the biggest media consumers in the world are so badly informed, this pretty well tells it all. The Media Can Legally Lie.
According to Akre and Wilson, the station was initially very excited about the series. But within a week, Fox executives and their attorneys wanted the reporters to use statements from Monsanto representatives that the reporters knew were false and to make other revisions to the story that were in direct conflict with the facts.
Fox editors then tried to force Akre and Wilson to continue to produce the distorted story. When they refused and threatened to report Fox's actions to the FCC, they were both fired.
Akre and Wilson sued the Fox station and on August 18, 2000, a Florida jury unanimously decided that Akre was wrongfully fired by Fox Television when she refused to broadcast (in the jury's words) “a false, distorted or slanted story” about the widespread use of BGH in dairy cows.
[...] FOX appealed the case, and on February 14, 2003 the Florida Second District Court of Appeals unanimously overturned the settlement awarded to Akre. The Court held that Akre’s threat to report the station’s actions to the FCC did not deserve protection under Florida’s whistle blower statute, because Florida’s whistle blower law states that an employer must violate an adopted “law, rule, or regulation."
In a stunningly narrow interpretation of FCC rules, the Florida Appeals court claimed that the FCC policy against falsification of the news does not rise to the level of a "law, rule, or regulation," it was simply a "policy." Therefore, it is up to the station whether or not it wants to report honestly.
During their appeal, FOX asserted that there are no written rules against distorting news in the media. They argued that, under the First Amendment, broadcasters have the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on public airwaves.
Fox attorneys did not dispute Akre’s claim that they pressured her to broadcast a false story, they simply maintained that it was their right to do so.
OK, pick your jaw up off the floor. That some court thinks they CAN is bad enough, that these people assert their right to do so pretty well kicks it all down the hole. And these guys wonder why their credibility is in the toilet and the net is burning them left right and centre.
Oh, and February 2003, 30 days before Iraq.
2007-11-21 10:05:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
7⤋
Fox News is the fascist arm of the GOP.
Via Fox, the Bush Regime streams steady doses of its "opiate to the masses" via a distribution network reaching 85 million cable subscribers. Fox and most other mainstream media entities are the syringes mainlining the mind-altering, psychosis-inducing propaganda munificently showered upon Americans by the Party. Social Darwinists comprising the Party, including major corporate shareholders and executives, Israeli interests, the military industrial complex, plutocrats, the power players of the Religious Right, and intellectual elites hold the Great Beast (us "commoners") at bay with a powerfully addictive state of being called the American Dream.
Fox News and the Bush Regime have brain-washed them into believing that terrorists and their sympathizers are lurking around every corner, poised to infect them with a lethal virus, slice them with box cutters or obliterate them with a suicide bomb. In the black and white perspective of the Neo-Cons, you are with us or against us. If you do not fit into their narrow and misguided notion of conservatism, you must be a "liberal". The American media/propaganda machine (which the Empire's power moguls have brilliantly portrayed as "liberal" to obfuscate the fact that six corporate conglomerates own 90% of the mainstream media market) has sharply defined the "treasonous", "ineffectual" nature of "liberals", portraying them as soft on crime, sympathetic to those demonic terrorists, Socialists and Communists, immoral, and militarily weak.
2007-11-21 10:02:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
8⤋
Fox News: "Says that ; threat level raised"
2007-11-21 10:03:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by jmc 4
·
5⤊
4⤋
Fox News: All the news you need; even stuff we make up.
2007-11-21 10:08:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by clint_slicker 6
·
4⤊
6⤋
Pin Head; or Patriot?
Fox news is saving this country from socialism and moral decline. It balances the scale.
Whew.....I think we've touched a nerve here!
Blessings Juju
2007-11-21 10:03:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ju ju 6
·
7⤊
7⤋
fox news "the fairly unblanced news channel?"
2007-11-21 10:08:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by tyler "god of typos" 5
·
3⤊
6⤋
Truth Hurts ; Sorry Liberals
2007-11-21 10:05:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Neal 4
·
6⤊
8⤋
No Spin; Just Truth
2007-11-21 10:05:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Snoot 5
·
6⤊
8⤋
"Too long; didn't read."
Describing any source that doesn't agree with them.
2007-11-21 10:06:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋