English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-21 01:57:21 · 10 answers · asked by cmerritt32 2 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

10 answers

( 2w + 7 ) ( w - 5 )
Check
2 w ² - 10 w + 7 w - 35
2 w ² - 3 w - 35 (as required)

2007-11-21 02:03:57 · answer #1 · answered by Como 7 · 2 1

Divide all coefficients by 2 to get:
2(w^2 - 1.5w - 17.5)

On your Albert Nestler 23/R (Albert Einstein and Werner Von Braun's favorite slide rule), set the left index of the C scale over 1.75 on the D scale.

Move the cursor down the slide, comparing the values on the CI scale to the D scale. Eventually, you'll come to two values that are 1.5 apart.

In fact, that will happen when the 5 of the CI scale is above the 3.5 of the D scale.

That means (w^2 - 1.5 w - 17.5) = (w -5)(w + 3.5)

Your final factor answer is:

2(w + 3.5)(w - 5)

If you don't like having non-integers in one of the terms, multiply the 2 into the second term to get:

(2w + 7)(w-5)

2007-11-21 02:15:04 · answer #2 · answered by Bob G 6 · 0 1

Look at the first number - you know one parenthesis will have a 2x, the other x.
(2x )(x )
Find the factors of the third number - it is either 1&35 or 5&7. Since it is negative, the signs will be different. The rest is trial and error to determine which parenthesis each goes in - do the Outer and Inner.
(2x 5)(x 7)
14x - 5x = 9x
(2x 7)(x 5)
10x - 7x = 3x
The middle sign is negative so the number that gave you the 10x has the (-) sign.
(2x+7)(x-5)

2007-11-21 02:06:31 · answer #3 · answered by Kris S 4 · 1 1

2w + 7 )( w -5

2007-11-21 02:01:08 · answer #4 · answered by a c 7 · 1 0

(2w + 7) (w - 5)

2007-11-21 02:01:15 · answer #5 · answered by Doctor Q 6 · 1 0

(2w + 7)(w-5)

2007-11-21 02:00:28 · answer #6 · answered by mom 7 · 1 0

(2w+7)*(w-5)

2007-11-21 02:00:29 · answer #7 · answered by artie 4 · 1 0

(2w+7)(w-5)

2007-11-21 02:05:33 · answer #8 · answered by someone else 7 · 1 1

(2w+7)(w-5)
2w*w=2w^2
7*w=7w
-5*2w=-10w
7*-5=-35

2w^2-3w-35

2007-11-21 02:02:26 · answer #9 · answered by Dave aka Spider Monkey 7 · 1 1

It has first of all w status on my own for the two aspects. the different side is an integer. The integers could upload as much as 3 and multiply as much as eight. I cant discover any blend which could try this. This equation is unsolvable.

2016-10-17 14:54:32 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers