now he is going to jail (i think) but do you believe he was guilty when he shot his wiife? I do but thats my opioin whats yours?
2007-11-21 00:45:15 · 10 answers · asked by dc_snow_rules 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I think it was made PRETTY darned clear with the evidence that OJ was guilty of slicing his wife's throat and stabbing her friend to death...
Sadly, that occured just after the "Rodney King Riots", and Los Angeles juries were scared sh*tless of starting up more trouble by finding OJ guilty.
2007-11-21 01:04:42 · answer #1 · answered by mariner31 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
My opinion (for what it's worth) is that he was guilty, guilty, guilty, but the trial was such a sideshow that the jury was hopelessly confused. The judge lost all control and O.J.'s "dream team" of highly paid lawyers did everything they could to out-talk, out-maneuver and create so much confusion, nobody would be able to figure things out. (I know that's what they were paid to do but there are limits.)
As far as O.J. is concerned, why would somebody write a book called "If I Did It" unless they did??
The day that verdict was declared, I was ashamed to be a lawyer.
2007-11-21 08:54:06 · answer #2 · answered by CGordo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wasn't sure until I heard his wife's blood was on the floor board of his Bronco, and found on his bedroom carpet. The bloody glove could have been planted behind his house, but Kato heard a noise and I believe it was OJ.
Come on, OJ was high on cocaine that night, he went over to visit Nicole, and flipped out when he saw her with another guy. Case close for me. Final answer
2007-11-21 08:58:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it was likely that he was responsible for her death. Even though a criminal jury found him not guilty, the civil jury found him responsible at the wrongful death trial. The difference is in the burden of proof. At the criminal trial, the accused is "not guilty" if there is a shadow of a doubt. At civil, the accuser only has to prove by a preponderance of the evidence, or 50.1%
2007-11-21 08:52:54 · answer #4 · answered by browneyedgirl623 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no doubt in my mind that he killed his wife and her friend. The verdict just went to show how much an attorney can pervert the justice system
2007-11-21 09:02:42 · answer #5 · answered by sammael_coh 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do believe he did kill his wife and goldman guy, but i think he had help. who in their right mind would make police chase them for hours if their not guilty. he may have had luck here in our world but in gods world he will pay, no im not religious but u do pay for the bad u do. so good luck oj simpson!!
2007-11-21 08:58:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He didn't shoot anyone
BUT
He did nearly slice her head off !!
Read Chris Darden's book regarding the case, you will have no doubts after reading what evidence was supressed.
2007-11-21 08:51:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
He didn't shoot his wife, he stabbed her multiple times. Yes he was, and still is guilty of killing his wife.
2007-11-21 08:49:57 · answer #8 · answered by rlstaehle 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Until after the trial.....
2007-11-21 08:53:45 · answer #9 · answered by Rue U 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My blackness wont allow me to answer that question
2007-11-21 08:52:41 · answer #10 · answered by Fenix 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋