English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It's the same old story,

US. government claims 128 Vietcong and 22 civilians were killed, but in reality it was " the mass murder of 347 to 504 unarmed Vietnamese civilians, mostly women and children"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Lai

2007-11-20 23:05:41 · 6 answers · asked by . 5 in Politics & Government Politics

thanks Q&A

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haditha_killings

2007-11-20 23:16:08 · update #1

6 answers

Don't forget the American govt were so blase about the massacre of civilians at Haditha (including women and children)that they didn't even feel it needed to be investigated until forced to by the Time magazine report.

Edit:
'Hi', here are some more links re war crimes in Iraq:

Al-Mahmudiyah rape and murders:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmudiyah_killings

Hamdania kidnapping and murder:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdania_incident#Unlawful_Shooting

2007-11-20 23:14:29 · answer #1 · answered by James T 3 · 0 0

so a ways in Iraq ever one that has been cost and face path. A soldier even seems the incorrect way is front website information. Murtha talked approximately as his fellow Marines chilly blooded murders come to establish the costs are dropping swifter than Congress's approval score. the costs made interior the click while investigations are finished discover no longer something. however the beheading of our troops or how Muslims focused on women human beings and little ones circulate unnotice by potential of folk such as you. i ask your self why?

2016-12-16 15:08:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Just look at their history and you will see that bloodlust is in the American psyche.

First the Indians got in their way so they commited a genocide (killing at LEAST 2 million).

Then the blacks got “uppity” and demanded equality so they lynched many thousands (the killers repeatedly acquitted by all white juries).

Now the Muslims are the targets of their hatred.
Thank goodness I’m not a Muslim - there is no limit to the bloodthirstiness of Americans.
******************************...
Edit:
The Americans didn't even care that the Muslims they were bombing in Iraq were not the ones who attacked on 9/11 - the joy of killing was satisfaction enough.

2007-11-20 23:13:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

You are confused. My Lai was in Vietnam. It was 40 years ago. The US military has won the battle in Iraq. No one is currently getting massacred. Try to pay attention to the news and drop your prejudice.

2007-11-20 23:23:48 · answer #4 · answered by regerugged 7 · 0 3

When will you libs start pointing the finger at those responsible for the mass deaths...the TERRORISTS...not GW

I know you wont as your so blinded by hate that if you farted you would say it is GW's fault....when in reality you libs just stink like ****

2007-11-20 23:42:45 · answer #5 · answered by consrgreat 7 · 0 2

Do you think the Iraqis were better off under Saddam's reign?

2007-11-21 00:56:50 · answer #6 · answered by elaine 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers