...or has that card been played out?
2007-11-20 20:20:33 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
No, but after listening to the various democratic candidates' proposals, they're scaring me into voting republican..And the only republican who seems to have given much thought to any of the issues appears to be Thompson, who I seriously doubt will get the nomination.
2007-11-20 20:50:49 · answer #1 · answered by jelesais2000 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Republicans will certainly try to inject fear one last time. Mr. "I was there at 9/11" (Giulliani) will most certainly be the candidate. I think most people are tired of using fear as a factor in deciding who they will vote for. We are certainly no safer, our dollar is worthless and we've alienated ourselves from most of the world. There are enough independents this time around that are going to switch to the Dems this election cycle. When 70% of the electorate says we are on the wrong track, that can only be bad news for Bush and the Republican party.
2007-11-20 23:01:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Democrats have found a way to scare me into voting Republican, (Hillary Clinton).
As for the remark by GQ_SLC, as I have said before, had Al Gore won his "home state" (Tennessee) in 2000, Florida would not have mattered, and it would have been President Albert Gore, Jr.
2007-11-20 22:54:26 · answer #3 · answered by Grayrider 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, not Ron Paul.. in fact I prefer him over the top tier democrats..
Both Senator Clinton and Senator Obama cannot commit to withdrawing troops out of Iraq by 2013, possibly even later... Paul has a proper exit strategy outlined for Iraq, one which will have the troops home within 3-6 months. Both Clinton and Obama, voted in favor of reauthorizing the Patriot Act, Paul voted against it. Both Clinton and Obama, haven't ruled out the option of using strikes against Iran.. they also support Bush's sanctions against the country.. Paul on the other hand advocates a non-interventionist foreign policy where we handle situations with diplomacy.. Clinton and Obama, are both in favor of amnesty for illegal immigrants and higher taxes to reduce the U.S. debt.. Paul however is for stronger borders and will reduce government spending to take the burden of taxpayers..
2007-11-21 00:14:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Get rich quick schemes in the capitalist business world, (buyouts, IPOs, conglomerates, acquisitions, mergers, and the stock market), do not actually work. Remaining solvent does not actually exist within false economics capitalism.
Profit existing in the capitalist business world, or millionaires existing within capitalism, is pathological deception committed by the 21 organizations spying on the population with plain clothes agents, (with covert fake names and fake backgrounds).
Actual economics is the persons paying the monthly business loan payments of companies voting at work in order to control the property they are paying for.
Capitalism is the psychology of imaginary parents, false economics, and the criminal deception of employees that are paying the bills (including the stocks and bonds, or shares) of companies.
Anti-democracy republicanism is the psychology of imaginary parents, and false government.
2007-11-24 06:32:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's hope that card has been played out. Bush scared alot of "Catholics" last time playing the anti-abortion card. Florida has ****** the United States over and over again. I'm not set on a canidate yet, but I'm sure as hell it will not be a Republican.
2007-11-20 20:58:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
That's exactly what his buddy John Howard is trying to do to win our election scare us into thinking we can't do without him but every dog has its day and his will be on Saturday when the Australian public vote him out.
2007-11-20 22:11:31 · answer #7 · answered by molly 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOW, Alex B PHD, i think of that it is definitely certainly one of the main spectacular question I even have ever seen published interior the politics area. although i being a Conservative does not want to establish that take place, i've got faith it might assure Hillary a win on the polls.
2016-12-16 15:02:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am thinking Bush & Co will try and stage a terror alert or national emergency (like their friend in pakistan) to stop the elections and hold on to power.
2007-11-21 05:25:12 · answer #9 · answered by EC HERE 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Republicans dont have to scare people. Democrats will scare people to the Republicans on their own.
2007-11-20 21:42:21 · answer #10 · answered by Avatar_defender_of_the_light 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋