2007-11-20 20:03:22 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
One world government. The problem isn't so much a lack of food as it is an unfair distribution of it. All too often the food that the world sends to help the starving ends up in the hands of local dictators and warlords who use it to feed their own people and soldiers or they sell it to make a profit to buy more soldiers and weapons. So we need on government that can control and depose dictators and warlords. Right now they get their legitimacy from claiming that they are the local government. If there were no local governments this excuse would no longer work.
2007-11-20 20:41:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Step one... destroy the greedy...
.... what? We can't go through with Step One?
I guess we can't.
Cooperation is important after all.
Step Two,.. forget the monetary requirements for people that produce food to keep up their plants and critters.
What's that? Can't go with Step One or Step Two.
Step Three... help from the best,.. oh damn,.. they are rioting about our attempts at Step One and Step Two. Part of them are Greedy and the majority need Money to accomplish things.
Stupid.. Greedy.,.. people... and their money.
Oh great and people are complaining they need food and basic needs as well so can't commit to this.
What next? Transportation-- Mad for the first 3 steps
Can't get food to magiclly start circulateing in some places, can't get the food to them,.. can't get the people away from them.
We are terrifying the desperate hungry people while we do this as well.
Hmm,.. I guess the last thing we could do is ask for help, giving help, to help these people be able to create their own food. But they are getting paid more to kill themselves and don't have enough land of their own,.. not like they own any land at the rate certain things have been going.
But you know their land is already being ruined by what is currently generateing money. The odd thing is when these people do something unique and off the wall,.. they get more money and help then if they just mindlessly follow your plan or containue their current path.
People would love to pay and arm and a leg for something someone they just set for life by paying and arm and leg made,.. that is unique. And there are also times people find a demand to fill,.. this creates a constant source of income.
Seriously, they need another source of income so their land can stableize or they can be given their own land before they can move on to working on it. They need the supplies and about 4 years for food to be at an acceptable ammount.
2007-11-21 05:14:16 · answer #2 · answered by sailortinkitty 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We can't. Too many people are reproducing who shouldn't.
I know this will cause shrieks, but famine is one way of nature attempting to keep over population under control; so there can be some protection and balance.
2007-11-21 05:33:41 · answer #3 · answered by LodiTX 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Be good yourself and spread that positive good rays among your friends and let them do the same..... it ends the starvation for good in every little corner of the world.
2007-11-21 04:08:59 · answer #4 · answered by Manjula 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
when equality spreads to every tiny weeny little corners of the world?
2007-11-21 04:22:53 · answer #5 · answered by ^^' 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Continue with the charity.
lt would be better if all of us would drop a coin daily and all proceeds go to them 100%.
2007-11-21 04:13:47 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋