If we implement expansionary or contractionary policies to help balance the budget, this could fuel an overheated economy, or move our economy away further from potential output. So should we accept deficit as a normal thing to happen? Or should we make balancing the budget our main goal? What do you think is more important?
2007-11-20
17:47:23
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Social Science
➔ Economics
During the dot com era, the state and federal government had huge amounts of income...but they did not realize that this is just temporary. Its not going to last forever. It is easy to forget that when you can spend the money on great things for the well-being of citizens. This will then create a huge budget deficit down the road as government spending (on all the infrastructure already put into place) exceeds tax revenues by a large amount...
2007-11-20
19:20:03 ·
update #1
European...do just say what you "think" sounds right? Or do you actually think about it?
2007-11-20
19:22:27 ·
update #2