English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

yes. notice how they equate universal health care with full blown socialism, a clear sign of either deliberate slander or poor education

2007-11-20 15:04:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 5

in fact that whilst the liberal socialist democrats proceed to spew bipartisanship, they're people who proceed to act in a partisan way. they're hypocrites. the final analysis is they used naive republicans to decontrol the industries so they might substitute into the suitable regulatory government and then they coated their wallet with the money that we are having now to pay for. Ask Chris Dodd and Barney Frank. and don't even get me began on the wonderful interest that Nancy Pelosi has accomplished addressing this concern. the place grew to become into she 2 years in the past whilst the concern grew to become into presented and he or she did no longer something. the place is she on the instant at formulating a plan. and then her for sure politically charged speech the day earlier on the instant. The liberal socialist democrats want administration and could make the yank public go through till they get entire administration.

2016-10-17 14:05:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Republicans in general, no.

But there are Far Right people who think less conservative Republicans are "Rhinos" (Republicans In Name Only), and view Democrats as either Communists, or their "Useful Idiots" who do the bidding of the Communists without realizing the damage they are doing to America.

Much of Conservative Talk Radio falls into this category, however, so this view has become more prevalent and more noticeable.

2007-11-20 21:33:58 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. Bad Day 7 · 1 1

NO! I have been a Republican for as long as I could vote - until the last election when I thought adding Democrats in Congress would be beneficial to add balance.

I was wrong. Adding Democrats just meant they could spend our tax dollars even faster on things America does not want like the North American Union and lots of parties with plenty of illegals paid to serve them.

The Democratic President showed the world how to get by with lies until he got impeached.

I think we have seen plenty of what the Democratic party represents: higher taxes, lies, destruction of our Constitution - and there are plenty of Republicans doing the same thing!

It's time to clean up our government by voting out of office those from both parties who vote against the people who pay their salaries and who do not support & follow our Constitution.

We need a President and Congress who will secure our borders and send the illegals back to where they came from. We need the laws enforced - not some pretense to action.

Isn't it obvious that the rest of the world has different governments from ours? We are not a monarchy with a king though it appears some seem to think so. We established the best government in the world through hard work and laws to protect our country through our Constitution.

Our brave military has protected our country through dedication and honor to our country. Isn't it time our government authorities started doing the same?

We need a Revolution - back to the Constitutional government of the people, by the people and for the people of the United States of America!

As to the rest of the world, it is not up to the United States to police the rest of the world. We need to take care of our own country and eliminate the debt that Congress - both parties - has created. We need less government on the payroll and less spending on foreign governments.

2007-11-20 15:12:46 · answer #4 · answered by Naturescent 4 · 1 3

Most of them do but the top dogs recognize it for what it is, a technique.

Little do they know, or care, that they loose respectability when they paint everybody, including the New York Times, with same 'liberal' brush.

2007-11-20 15:25:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

yeah more or less. but it's not just them. it's the country, the world. i think it's all the excess lead in the atmosphere after 100 years of automobiles.

2007-11-20 15:40:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Hmmm, well. Now that you mention it. Lets go through the list of countries with high free trade ratings. Free and open economies perform better than any other. I would stop short of calling closed trade nations enemies but, they are, at least, adversarial and a global burden.
Keep in mind, I am an isolationist, not to be confused with a protectionist, and in favor of closing down in some sectors.

Overall the Western Hemisphere boasts a higher-than-average degree of economic freedom. However the Americas' historic march toward greater freedom largely stalled last year, according to the 2007 "Index of Economic Freedom."

The United States received the highest ranking in the region: 82.0, good enough for a 4th place finish worldwide. The U.S. led the region in four of the 10 categories examined in the Index: investment freedom, financial freedom, labor freedom and protection of property rights.

Canada was the only other country from the region to rank in the top 10 globally. Canada led the region in three categories: free trade, ease of opening and closing businesses, and freedom from corruption. It overall score of 78.7 was good for 10th place, worldwide.

But many of the region's smaller nations seem to be "stuck in poverty traps," Index co-author Tim Kane says. Since higher levels of economic freedom lead to higher GDP per capita, "the way to break out of those traps would be for nations to promote more economic freedom. But that's not what's happening."

"The recent rise of populists like Evo Morales (Bolivia) and Hugo Chavez (Venezuela) threatens to widen the freedom gap in the Americas even more," warn Index authors Tim Kane, Kim Holmes and Mary Anastasia O'Grady.

For now, however, the economic freedom is distributed in a more balanced fashion in the Americas than in any other region, the Index found. The U.S. and Canada are far and away the leaders, while Cubaand Venezuela are the only countries ranked as economically "repressed." The other 25 economies are clustered in the middle of the scale.

Compared to a year earlier, 19 countries in the region received lower scores while 10 others received higher ratings for economic freedom. Only Chile dropped into a lower category, falling from "free" to "mostly free." Two climbed: Honduras from "mostly unfree" to "moderately free" and Haitifrom a "repressed" to a "mostly unfree" rating of its economy.

As in previous years, the Index ratings reflect an analysis of dozens of economic variables, grouped into 10 categories, although this year those categories have been revised. The 10 freedoms measured are: business freedom, trade freedom, fiscal freedom, freedom from government, monetary freedom, investment freedom, financial freedom, property rights, freedom from corruption and labor freedom. Ratings in each category are averaged to produce the overall Index score.

Worldwide, the average rating for economic freedom held essentially steady, with "much room for improvement" the Index editors write. Of the 157 countries ranked, only seven are classified as "free" (a score of 80 or higher). Another 23 are "mostly free" (70-79.9). The bulk of countries—107 economies—are either "moderately free" (60-69.9) or "mostly unfree" (50-59.9). Some 20 countries have "repressed" economies, with total freedom scores below 50 percent.

The Wall Street Journal has published the Index for 13 consecutive years.

2007-11-20 15:17:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Do Democrats believe that almost everyone in the modern world, but themselves, are Neo-CONs and Nazis?
...And therefore... the 'enemy'?

2007-11-20 15:08:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

I consider socialism to be a threat to the American way of life, so yes, I would consider socialists America's enemies. Capitalism is what has built the nation and is what will make us prosper in the future. No one prospers under socialism. There are plenty of other types of people in the world too, mostly fascists.

2007-11-20 15:05:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 6

Well you left out Muslim, terrorists and Arabs - oh and homosexuals....

No you have covered everyone else...

2007-11-20 21:26:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, but I do believe that is an ignorant question, in which you exercised the same thought process for which you accused republicans.

2007-11-20 15:07:14 · answer #11 · answered by DOOM 7 · 4 5

fedest.com, questions and answers