One of his own staffers (Scott McClellon) is outing him as being corrupt. Bush was involved with a cover up in the CIA leak case.
2007-11-20 11:09:39 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This is such a great question... i REALLY REALLY dislike bush he is the worst president ever...
2007-11-20 11:13:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 7⤋
I voted for President Bush twice (without any regrets because the Democratic candidates sucked), but am hardly a fan of his, much less a blind supporter. However, there is absolutely no evidence that President Bush is personally corrupt. You may disagree with Bush's policies as I do (I want Bush to nuke the Arabs rather than keep on letting Americans die in the Middle East for example), but that does not make Bush corrupt. At worst, President Bush is no better than any other politician and in truth he is far less corrupt than most American presidents including Bill Clinton who was in countless scandals while in office.
As far as Scott McClellan (spelling people) goes, he is a long term Washington political hack with no loyalty to anybody who was forced out of his job in the current administration. McClellan is just trying to make a buck off of a book deal and to make himself attractive to the next political hack he works for. As far as the so called CIA leak case goes, it was a minor bureaucratic mix up that was meaningless and is far too complicated to explain here. Democrats have been trying for 4 years to get some political points out of this so called CIA leak non issue, but nobody in America cares about it because it does not affect their lives and is too obtuse to make any sense out of.
2007-11-20 11:34:19 · answer #2 · answered by Matthew R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not saying that its impossible for Bush to be involved with a cover up, but I will reserve judgment until I know more about it.
Until then, would someone kindly remind him that we are approaching a $10 trillion deficit? That bothers me more than some sort of CIA outing cover-up.
2007-11-20 11:17:29 · answer #3 · answered by Pythagoras 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
extremely the alternative, whilst you look applying talking factors through the MSM, it does not take a school degree to be responsive to that's not something extra advantageous than political in nature and risk-free practices for pelosi. 2d, in spite of if cheney did do as you're saying, it wasn't even an carried out application first of all and in case you study the regulation, it nevertheless gave the administrative branch the authorization to enforce it if want be(and then tell congress). you spot, once you get legal professionals making the guidelines, they continually depart themselves "loopholes" for this very concern. so, if the regulation were written the way the dems needed, then they might have a case...yet then, they might could concern approximately anybody else in contact that "knew" what grew to become into occurring. ultimately, i think the regulation grew to become into for "heads of state", no longer extremist terrorists and that i'm of the opinion if we could have been doing this from the beginning up, we does no longer be dealing with the "gitmo" debacle....we does no longer have any detainees to agonize approximately. yet sadly...it is what occurs whilst human beings think of there are "morals" in "conflict" ...large answer "greatrightwing"...
2016-10-17 13:30:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think a lot of people already believed this. Kudos to Scott McClellon for telling the truth, which is probably going to happen often, now that so many have left their jobs with this administration.
2007-11-20 11:22:26 · answer #5 · answered by ArRo 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the CIA leak case - o please
she was never a covert operative (except for the DNC)
and her husband outed her regularly at parties in Washy
can't wait for the Dems' socialism to come in 2008
So proud of Chavez and Iran's pres who think we
are on a slide in the USA
guess they have accomplished something in the last 1 1/2 years since they took over Congress
and what about Tunagate - never heard of it - of course, the lib media has hid it well
Nancy has a corporation in her district which has a tuna fleet
in American Samoa who is EXEMPT for paying the minimum wage to it's workers - they only pay $3.30 not $7.50
and what about the parade that featured Sweatshop?
the costumes(lack thereof) and 'activities' performed in public
just what our country needs
2007-11-20 11:19:02 · answer #6 · answered by tom4bucs 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Anyone who doesn't yet believe that the Bush administration is corrupt is far beyond the point of being reached by logic, reason or facts. The 30% will stick by him no matter what. He can do no wrong to them.
2007-11-20 11:14:03 · answer #7 · answered by haywood jablome 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Oh, please! Bush has been corrupt since day one! Him and Cheney both are. Watch, after the next election, the gas prices will drop like a rock!
2007-11-20 11:19:31 · answer #8 · answered by stef_leppard 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Do You Always Ask Questions Like This?
2007-11-20 11:15:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bush supporters don't try to have rational discussions with name-calling Bush haters. (Your tone and indictment are obvious in your question). You can't be reasoned with. It is a waste of time to say anything more to you since you can't reason for yourself, but must depend on the lies of our leftist media.
2007-11-20 11:17:30 · answer #10 · answered by Lynie 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No because Bill Clinton's press secretary got a DWI.
2007-11-20 11:15:04 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋