...was a globalised socialist anti-religious dictatorship lead by me where racists and bigots would be persecuted whilst intellectuals and generous people would be celebrated.
2007-11-20 10:54:36 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. I don't trust that you are a magnanimous dictator - who's to say that 10 years down the line you decide that generous people are the ones who donate money to you, and racist people are those of a differing race who do not? The only truly fair dictator would be a machine, as it has no self interests and no ego.
Still the rest of it sounds ok-ish - what little details of it you give of course. I'm unsure about the words ANTI-religious? Would religious people be persecuted and forced to give up their beliefs? I don't think that's right - but I think church and state should be ABSOLUTELY seperate (no faith schools, public or private, full stop for instance)
2007-11-20 10:59:56 · answer #1 · answered by Mordent 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well when you say anti Religious you have allready labeled yourself a bigot, so I guess you will not be in charge as you would be persecuted too.
Everyone has some type of racist feelings, it is human nature. The true test is if one can rise above their misgivings about people.
Its almost best to Hate everyone equally until you get to know someone that way your labeled an A**hole instead of a bigot
2007-11-20 19:06:01 · answer #2 · answered by cutiessailor 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No - for starters "socialist anti-religious" sounds like North Korea!
2007-11-20 18:58:20 · answer #3 · answered by Constitutional Watchdog 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
definatly not. i happen to know mich k and he genuinly believes that he should be able to decide who does and doesnt hav a right to vote. he doesnt realise that there is anything wrong with that! iv had conversatins with him where he´s told me - some people only vote because of "xyz" and those issues arent important, so why should they have the right to vote! what a weirdo.
and he wets the bed
2007-11-20 23:11:58 · answer #4 · answered by PADSTER17 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Other than the anti-religious dictatorship, sure.
2007-11-20 19:00:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It beats a religous dictatorship.
Monotheists hate fee speech.
Bush and Osama Bin Laden, ditto!
racists bigots? You mean Republicans?
2007-11-20 18:58:23 · answer #6 · answered by Zinger! 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
No.
But I'd like to know what chemicals you're on at this very moment.
2007-11-20 19:00:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Naw, I will pass on that thought.
2007-11-20 19:20:25 · answer #8 · answered by Bubba 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no thanks
2007-11-20 18:58:20 · answer #9 · answered by ken s 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No thanks.
2007-11-20 18:58:03 · answer #10 · answered by cmdrbnd007 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋