i'm no fan of Hillary (or Bill), but when you say you are ''not against women," you totally contradict yourself with unproven claims, prejudice (who are "they" and who are "we?") and a whole raft of reactionary, one dimensional bigotry.
The most laughable part of this is your suggestion that women lack the intelligence of men. The facts prove otherwise, but you go on, apparently without irony, to write a grammatically poor piece littered with spelling mistakes. And what on earth is "hiliery?" Some sort of back complaint?
An old Turkish proverb goes: "One woman who knows what to do is better than a thousand men who don't," and I truly understand what they are getting at!
Given a choice between a woman or one of your intellect, I know who I'd back. Sorry to offend, but I know you'll probably report this and have it deleted anyway, so what the heck.
2007-11-20 10:06:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Z 1
·
5⤊
1⤋
I'm embarrassed for you. You don't love women, you love your fantasy idea of what you think a woman is or should be. Not smart enough? Sweetie, Hillary Clinton could intellectually mug you with her tongue tied in a knot. There's nothing to be afraid of, I promise. She really isn't out to form a nation of Amazons who keep men chained in the basement for their amusement. She has no designs to destroy this country, but to instead make it better. And maybe you should learn something about women in general. Sen. Clinton is 60 years old, she doesn't have to even deal with having periods anymore. Here's something else to think about. Even if she did what would it matter? Any woman who has climbed high enough on the ladder to be a Senator hardly suffers from debilitating PMS. BTW - I'm still giggling at the thought of Hillary Clinton being too emotional to run our country, now THAT'S funny.
2007-11-20 18:08:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
The sex of the president is not an issue. The qualifications of the candidates are. Clinton has demonstrated she could not control her own family how can we expect her to run the country?? As soon as pressure is applied on Her, Billy boy rides into the area and shoots the normal blanks at the media to defend Hillary. They have perfected the denial and delay tactics that He began using in 96. Naturally the special interest group behind them control most of the media so US poor Americans have to suffer. Someday a good woman will be in the white house but it certainly will not be Hillary unless she is visiting.
2007-11-20 19:52:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by old codger 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Considering the only woman likely to be on the ballot is Hillary Clinton, and considering the 'team' aproach she & her husband took last time, I think we have a pretty good idea what would happen, actually.
2007-11-20 17:56:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
women like man so it has the wright to be a president according to specific rules she may be better than men you see and hear about buch works in every country killing us troops for nothing many countries had women president you have banazir boto in pakistan after her is berwiz mishrif you see in his time many broblems that she will return banazir again you have elezabith in uk in holand biatres in aragantin were liza brown in anchient years also women was president you have cleopatra in egypt belkis in yemen shagarit el dor in islamic egypt so wee seek honest clever wise president what ever he is man or women
2007-11-20 18:08:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by samy n 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
First of all, Hillary is 60. More than likely she's post menopausal.
There's no such thing as a man's job.
2007-11-20 17:56:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Is your picture in the dictionary next to the definition of "sexist pig"? It should be.
2007-11-20 18:03:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by ConcernedCitizen 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
You will become the LAUGHING stock of the World !
2007-11-20 19:35:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
She can't be worst, than what we have now.
2007-11-20 17:55:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Virgo27 6
·
5⤊
2⤋