Feign? Hell no, they'll truly be outraged. Imagine, all the power the executive branch has managed to consolidate...in the hands of Hillary Clinton...and she's using it against republicans. Feign, they'll be fighting off seizures they'll be so pissed.
2007-11-20 09:56:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
First - Hillary would NOT commit a treason act by outing a CIA operative - and hey- I know your taking some hot air from a few blow-hards for your post- and they have a hard time to get the satire in the comment - but yes- if President Hillary Clinton DID do something like that you'de see screaming red-faced "babies" crying up a strom!!
but see? these NeoNuts will feign outrage if even just say the name "Hillary" I kind've enjoy seeing that kind energy being wasted- it may even make global warming worse- but the entertainment value is priceless -
2007-11-20 14:42:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by omnimog 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Feign?! Why shouldn't we be outraged? You people, Hillary included, went after this administration for "outing" a glorified secretary who WASN'T undercover and who was doing the Georgetown party circuit at the time. They then went after the wrong guy! Then, they actually had the nerve to condemn our President for pardoning him when Clinton pardoned close to a hundred people right before he left office, including but not limited to, Hillary's brother!
Most of you neolibs don't think there's any real evidence to impeach the current President. You're just mad because the predominantly Republican congress dared to impeach the neolib god after he perjured himself in front of a grand jury, which also got him disbarred. You're damn right we'd keep Hill under a microscope.
2007-11-20 09:59:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
You have your facts incorrect. Valerie Plame did NOT qualify for undercover status. Libby did not leak her name, even the reporter that broke the story said so. Libby mentioned her husband.
This is similar to what happened. "Ms. Bush's husband works for the government." OMG, I just outed George Bush as working for the government. Federal Offense!
2007-11-20 09:58:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Nope.
You are WRONG.
(Whoever told you that, is making fun of you.)
Plame worked as a secretary for the last 5 years.
Walking in and out of the CIA Bldg.
That's not Undercover, honey.
I know. I had a Top Secret Security Clearance.
2007-11-20 09:53:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by dinamuk 4
·
4⤊
4⤋
Of course. Just like if Bush were 'indiscrete' with a chubby female intern and lied about it under oath, the Dems would be quick to impeach him.
It's all partisan politics.
2007-11-20 09:59:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
I've never seen or heard of any evidence that Plame was working undercover in Europe 3 months before she was "outed." Please provide some evidence of your assertion.
*Ok 50 minutes later and you've still not provided any evidence. I think it's pretty obvious you have no facts to back up your claims. I still haven't seen any lib provide evidence that Plame was a covert agent when "outed."
2007-11-20 09:53:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by VoodooPunk 4
·
3⤊
4⤋
Repubes normally "turn the other cheek" when their leaders do something immoral (most of the time). They act self-righteous when a Dem does something wrong.
Remember when Clinton was impeached for the BJ? They were outraged at the immorality. Now you have Rudy marrying his cousin, cross-dressing, Delay's corrupt dealings, Gannon sexcapades in the White House, Libby's lying, Rodriguez's lying, Bush's WMD fabrications, immoral war, Craig's pedophilic activities, etc. ad nauseum... but they pretend nothing's happpened.
2007-11-20 09:54:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
Valeria outed herself not Bush.
Liberals have ben outed secret projects and missions all the time putting many agents at risk.
Valeria was desk jockey you should read her account only there is plenty of evidence out there making the case Valeria is flat out liar.
2007-11-20 09:58:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
No, it's ok because Bush is president of the United States of America, and as we all know in this day and age that pretty much puts you above the law.
2007-11-20 09:55:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Nicholas A 2
·
2⤊
3⤋