Btw if you're 'bored' of Maddie please don't read this question & certainly don't answer.
-
Baby Grace was found in a box in the sea by fishermen.
These are similarities between Baby Grace & Maddie McCann.
- Baby Grace was wearing white trainers with purple flowers on them and a stripe around the bottom. A photo has seen Maddie McCann wear the same type of shoes.
- The box Baby Grace was found in could only be sold in WalMart stores. Gerry McCann had plenty of opportunity to visit WalMart while on his trip to the USA for the 'find Madeleine' campaign.
- Baby Grace was wearing clothes by Cherokee. People could buy these clothes in WalMart or Target. The clothes could also have been bought from Tesco in the UK.
More information can be found here.
http://www.truthformadeleine.com/babygrace.htm
2007-11-20
07:41:07
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
News & Events
➔ Current Events
this is frm the website above:
"Gerry, Kate and others drove to Huelva on August 3, 2007. This was 8 days after Dr. McCann returned from his visit to Washington DC. In his blog he writes about that trip:
'It is exactly 3 months since Madeleine was abducted. Kate and I had an early start as we drove to Huelva, 50Km over the border from Portugal in Southern Spain.'
This entry in his blog has perpetuated a myth that Huelva was 50km (30miles) from Praia da Luz. In fact, Huelva is 190km (120 miles) from Praia da Luz. This adds further mystery to a trip so far away from the place of disappearance and on a public holiday."
2007-11-20
07:42:31 ·
update #1
Katie and the first answerer - if you read the website they think that Gerry & Kate could have transported maddie by boat. that is if the kid is maddie.
2007-11-20
07:58:15 ·
update #2
The investigators considered Maddy and ruled out that Baby Grace was her soon after Baby Grace was found.
2007-11-20 18:17:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by DawnDavenport 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
At last, someone thinking on the same track as me, as I follow these 2 investigations.
There's something very fishy (excuse the pun!) about the Baby Grace case, and I wonder if the evidence has been tampered with upon the orders from British authorities, as has happened in Maddie's case. It would be truly noxious if this arm of manipulation has stretched that far.
However, it is ENTIRELY POSSIBLE for the missing Maddie to end up washing ashore in Galveston,Texas.
Here's how.
My pet theory was always that Maddie's body was removed shortly after she died, and before the alarm was called, and was spirited away to a British owned yacht. This yacht left its moorings after 2 years of being docked at Lagos harbour.
The British owner and the yacht have not been traced since.
There was a witness who saw a child being carried towards that mooring. My guess is that Murat was called in by the McCanns for a favour. Being a dual citizen and long term resident in the Algarve, he has many contacts with the affluent people he sells real estate to. He supplied the contact of a Brit with a yacht, (and was later double-crossed by the McCanns fingering him as the abductor!)
Then, one of two things could have happened in this scenario.
Either the body was dumped at sea, with weights, off the coast of Portugal.
Or the Brit-with-the-yacht took a nice trip to the Caribbean, and dumped it there. (There are Wallmarts and Tescos there too!)....(Note that he could also have gone further to the Gulf of Mexico, but a British yacht in the Caribbean is not an unusual sight).
That's how a body tossed at sea could could end up washing up on the Texas coast.
It has also been speculated that a box was boarded onto a cargo ship on a regular sailing to Galveston, Texas that departs from......HUELGA, Spain! Yes, the port town that was visited by the McCanns on a public holiday.
(Please note, to be fair, that Gerry's blog said Huelga was 50kms from the Spanish border, not from Praia da Luz....that was a misquote.) This scenario is more contrived, though, because the 'cargo' would have to be accompanied by the person who dumps it near Galveston........although, not impossible to arrange.
I lean towards the removal of Maddie's body at an earlier stage. (i.e. the yacht theory)
The most curious thing is that there appears no confirmation about whether Baby Grace's eye had that distinguishing mark of the Coloboma syndrome or not. Also, whether that mark, which is a 'gap' in the iris, can close up after death. Or even if Grace's right eye was 'intact' when found.....??
The plot thickens!.....And the mind boggles at all the mysteries surrounding these two cases.
2007-11-20 09:10:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by starling 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I really dont think that Baby Grace is Madeleine. How would anyone have snuck her in to the USA with all the news footage of little Maddie. Chances are Baby Grace is just a child missing from right here in the untied states and the police just havent found out which child
2007-11-20 07:49:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by fresh_horses_7 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
The authorities are doing a DNA test on the little girl that was found in the tote. That would be the only way they could prove if it was Maddie or not.
2007-11-22 16:14:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no way that baby Grace is Madeline. It is a coincidence that they are wearing similar clothes and the walmart box is also a coincidence. You have read too much into this as well. No way anyone could have sneaked this child into the US. NO way!
2007-11-20 07:56:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by katie d 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
What a good question. I gave you a star.
Here is a website by a Portuguese journalist which deals, inter alia, with Baby Grace AND with Madeleine cases. It is both in Portuguese and in English.
Please explore the site. It is brilliant.
http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/
2007-11-20 07:53:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by RED-CHROME 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it were her couldn't they simply have taken DNA by now? I don't think it is her to be honest, the link made for a surprising read...I'm still not sold on the hair length theory though!.
2007-11-20 08:03:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I thought they ruled out she was Madeleine using dental records?
2007-11-20 08:24:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋