Are scientists responsible?

Question

With the heated debate on the causes of global warming, to what extent are scientists responsible.
EG someone other than me invented the car and the fuel l use, l assume understanding the resulting emmisions...to what extent then are they responsible?

i just wanted to add that when an invention is made is there any environmental impact analysis done....ie how can l make a valued judgement if l am not informed fully.

Answer 1

There are many people to blame but it's the public that is targeted.

Answer 2

Well to some extent I suppose. But then we do have a choice as to whether or not we want to buy new technology. So we all play a part in the causes of global warming, not just the clever scientists whose intent was to make our lives easier.

Yet they are the ones who are trying to find ways of reducing emissions and other factors. So who knows eh?

Answer 3

Yes I suppose you could say that they are responsible but did they know at the time the car and the fuel to go in it would cause this sort of damage. I doubt it. The people I could blame would be all the logging companies who cut down millions of trees a year without replacing a single one. Trees absorb CO2 and produce oxygen .The way they are doing this, it won't be long before we have a treeless planet

Answer 4

Good idea. Lets blame the creators of our modern life. After all, Individuals will NEVER take the resposibility for misusing and/or abusing the inventions given to them. It's not the fault of the everyday person, just because they can't find the personal restaing to use the invention properly & in moderation.

Answer 5

Scientist and inventors may or may not be synonymous. It certainly would be nice if a scientist could invent a way to get rid of carbons in the atmosphere.

Answer 6

The engineers who designed the car are just as responsible as the marketing people who created the ads to sell the car, as are the salesmen in the dealerships who actually sold it, as are the mechanics who maintain it, as are YOU, the customer, who bought and drive it.

In other words, you can't duck the responsibility by trying to shift it to someone else, unless you're not driving at all.

Answer 7

customarily, no. Scientists look for to comprehend the organic international (user-friendly technology) or remedy a challenge (utilized technology). The motive at the back of their events is fairly much in no way criminal, nonetheless their discoveries would have criminal ability while misinterpreted or misused. in the examples you stated, discoveries bearing directly to cloning and stem cells have been immensely efficient contributions to biology, even nonetheless they be able to offend or attraction to blame. while used properly, such awareness is efficient, not risky. examine without postpone bearing directly to weapons progression is greater iffy; Oppenheimer is remembered as an remarkable scientist, yet his artwork led to hundreds of thousands of deaths and accidents. His artwork replaced into justified by utilising WWII and so he replaced into not culpable for outcomes of the atomic bomb. yet in a fashion, he and his team are to "blame", according to probability, for the state of nuclear proliferation that we've immediately. motive is an significant component in no depend if or not scientists would desire to be blamed for probably risky discoveries. in the regular public of cases, scientists have not got malicious motive.

Answer 8

Only ones I blame are one's that sell there skills and talents to highest bidder when bidder just wants to shelve them. Or who sells invention rights to someone who will shelve it. One creative law was passed that inventors of things that might help have to fund their own environmental study which few can afford.

Answer 9

I think that one of the reason we have scientist is to look into things that can hurt us. I think that it is partially scientiest fault for not warning us about global warming, because it seems to me that they would much rather date about it, then just say to themselves, "Weather or not this is real it would be better to be safe then sorry"

Answer 10

No
The people with the money are responsible.

A scientist did not drop the bomb or fire the gun or crash the plane or sell100million petrol cars.

Answer 11

I read a book, it said that for every one bad thing they tell us for example global warming. there are 5 good things they keep secret. this isnt to say global warming isnt happening, just meaning it isnt happening as fast asthey say or there are other reasons!