English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

whats your opinions and facts on this?

2007-11-20 07:18:31 · 10 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government Government

10 answers

9/11 - Terrorist attack. 4 planes hi-jacked. Two crashed in to World Trade Center, one in to the Pentagon, one in a field when the hi-jackers where stopped.

Iraq War - US led invasion based on suspicion of weapons of mass destruction.

2007-11-20 07:23:08 · answer #1 · answered by Go Bears! 6 · 4 1

Most are:
1. 9/11 was a total failure of national security under Condo Rice, who abandoned approx. 300 warnings from FBI, European nations, other networks. How could 19 stupid cavemen, with IQ well below average and no weapons do that? Planes have been hijackes since 1970 and all European planes had lockable cockpit doors. There was no airport security in the USA. None. Funny - no Government heads rolled. Instead the US went to disastrous wars with 2 countries, where the responsible Al-Queada was in at least 28 countries and even in US and Britain.
2. The wars have nothing done for national security, simple steps to install border security saved us so far from another incident. Still, we have 10,000 illegals crossing every day at will the borders of Mexico, only 3% get caught.

2007-11-20 15:30:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Iraq was unconstitutionally, unjustifiably, illegally and immorally attacked for three really lame reasons:
1. The Bush family had a personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein since the days of Desert Storm when George H.W. Bush was criticized, ridiculed and humiliated for not 'finishing the job' and ousting Hussein at that time;
2. Cheney coveted all that OIL swimming underneath Iraq's sands;
3. The giant U.S. military-industrial complex [which Eisenhower warned us about] needed to boost sagging profits from too many years of peace.

So, Bush lied to Congress, hoodwinked the American people, and conned our valiant U.S. troops into believing there was honorable purpose in attacking Iraq.

From its very first day, this evil, vile, obscene 'war' was all about OIL and WAR PROFITEERING.

675,000 Iraqis and 3,900 U.S. soldiers have sacrificed their lives so that a handful of wealthy elitists, oil barons, industrialists and power brokers can become wealthier and more powerful.

This is, by far, the most repugnant deception ever perpetrated on the American public. George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld and all their war-mongering friends deserve a special oil-soaked, blood-stained corner of Hell where they can rot eternally along with:
* 535 members of the most arrogant, contemptible, evil, incompetent, cowardly, corrupt Republican-led Congress in U.S. history that stood by and watched Bush run rip shod over our Constitution
-AND-
* 535 members of the most arrogant, contemptible, evil, incompetent, cowardly,, corrupt Democratic-led Congress ins U.S. history that promised to end this vile 'war' if elected, and - to date - have done absolutely nothing to keep that promise.
MAY GOD DAMN THEM ALL!!
-RKO- 11/20/07

2007-11-20 15:38:51 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 3 0

they shouldnt be.

9/11 - who really profitted?
the Leasor of the Building #7
Billions for his million dollar investment.

it took Bush 4 years to launch a formal investigation, that was understaffed and underfunded.
Bush refused to answer questions wihtout chenney present in the same room.

And all the other evideence that raises suspicion about 9./11
Like Norad being called away by Chenney who was the first V.P. ever to be given control over Norad at the exact time of 9/11

Stuff like that and no one wants to answer, or a president that doesnt launch an immediate investigation, but instead promises to go after those repsonsible.
Yet changes his mind and goes after Saddam

Putting too few troops there to cause chaos.
Causing Al Queda in iraq to develop, and trying tolink that as the reason to stay in Iraq.

The list goes on and on, and only republicans who would whipe bush's butt when he asked will agrue against the facts that keep coming up.

But after years of failed, terrible choices for america, republicans only want to focus on one months progress, in the deadliest year of this war.

Does that answer your question?

2007-11-20 15:25:47 · answer #4 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 2 0

more than that --they're being deliberately hoodwinked.

The whole 'war on terror' is actually a 'war OF terror '--, FEMA camps on former military bases, emergency executive powers which effectively suspend the Constitution and of course staged false flag attacks-- everything is based on power through deception, the sad thing is, many are still so brainwashed that even when confronted with truth and facts they still reject it and, characteristic of cult members,- attack those who try to disabuse them of the lies they've been fed.

2007-11-20 15:30:49 · answer #5 · answered by celvin 7 · 0 0

As we get further away from the events and hear more conspiracy theories. I think that we are getting more confused. Especially the younger people and those who still believe what they read in the newspaper. The war has taken a turn for the better sooner than I expected..

2007-11-20 15:25:24 · answer #6 · answered by DrB 7 · 0 2

Yes...most libs think Bush was behing 9/11. The planes, twin towers falling, pentagon...it's all been done with smoke and mirrors.

2007-11-20 15:25:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

well obviously 9-11 sparked the iraq war

2007-11-20 15:24:07 · answer #8 · answered by I'm Chris Hansen 7 · 1 4

yes they are

2007-11-20 15:21:55 · answer #9 · answered by a 5 · 3 0

yes we are

2007-11-20 15:21:34 · answer #10 · answered by collegecutie89 2 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers