English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Mainstreaming is the practice of educating students with special needs in regular classes during specific time periods based on their skills.

Here is the link: http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_/Mainstreaming.html

Inclusion is the practice of educating students with special needs in regular classes for all or nearly all of the day instead of in special education classes.

Here is the link: http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861620664/inclusion.html

2007-11-20 04:25:46 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference Special Education

7 answers

They are used interchangably because to a person teaching a regular ed classroom, the effect is the same. The child is in the regular ed classroom with the teacher. Generally, once a child is mainstreamed, it feels like inclusion.

2007-11-20 04:36:28 · answer #1 · answered by Colette H 2 · 1 1

It is used interchangeably because of misinformation. It is certainly not the same thing. Mainstreaming basically means that the child with special needs is "just visiting" the general ed class. Inclusion means they are there for the greatest extent of the day possible and they are a full-fledged member of the classroom community.

2007-11-20 10:30:10 · answer #2 · answered by charismaca88 2 · 0 0

In my school the difference is with inclusion their is a special education teacher in the classroom. I had a student who was mainstreamed for math only and he had no help from an inclusion teacher.

2007-11-20 10:35:04 · answer #3 · answered by sfroggy5 6 · 0 0

For most people, semantics isn't as important as it is for Webster and you. ;-)

It doesn't matter what it is called because the IEP should have laid out in steps what exactly the school is doing as far as least restrictive environment. Each child should be included to the extent that they can, whether it's for a full day (which would have driven my severely autistic child insane) or if it is for specific time periods. It should be need-driven, not ideal based.

2007-11-20 16:24:22 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

The Catholic church did not exist for many centuries yet quite yet another church and after some centuries of waft it grew to develop into the catholic church. As a follower of the LDS church the challenge got here while God elect to not call from now on prophets or apostles. The contributors of the church look to have executed their maximum suitable, yet guy can not run what's Gods.

2016-10-02 03:01:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So what has happened to you recently which makes you want to bring this up everyday? Ya might as well tell us!

2007-11-20 16:12:37 · answer #6 · answered by atheleticman_fan 5 · 1 0

neither should be done....!!!!!!
have a special school for each....
having special need children in classes with "normal" kids is just taking away an education for the normal kids.

2007-11-20 11:56:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers