2007-11-20 00:23:56 · 10 answers · asked by indychamp 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Although i'd love to be i'm not in the top 1% yet so this president's policies don't really benefit me, at all. I think it's hillarious that people start throwing the word "socialist" around while in reality they're voting AGAINST their own best interest.
The American dollar is buying less and less everyday. Gas is $3 a gallon and foreclosures are up 100% from last year. Oh and those troops Bush loves to support, when they come home 25% of them become homeless.
I hope keeping the gays from getting married was worth all the trouble the country is in.
2007-11-20 00:42:50 · answer #1 · answered by Alex G 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
it's scary there are people as ignorant as Jake S. who think it's because she is a woman when it's because she is crooked and will screw up this country.
and Alex G is so ignorant he is oneother duped by Democrats who say they will help middle class from there huge mansions, when in reality the tax cuts President Bush has made has helped the middle class more.
2007-11-20 09:01:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sometimes I wish there really was a 'left' instead of this strawman the reactionaries keep yelping about. We live in a world dominated by trans-national corporations and rancid thugocracies. We live in a country that longs for a government that put the American wage-earner first...a centerist government that takes care of business. When anyone suggests that, someone like Sen. Clinton 'feristance.....all hell breaks loose. Some right wing radio bozo will trot out the old 'leftist' strawman and the ditto-heads will begin to salvate. Buy a clue....there hasn't been a real 'left' in this country since grandpaw wore three cornered pants. By the way...Wall Street loves Clinton...so much for the arguments against reality.
2007-11-20 08:39:05 · answer #3 · answered by Noah H 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
No.
Hillary Clinton is a neoliberal, not a socialist.
She supports profit, rent, and interest. She supports "intellectual property," "absentee property," and the money monopoly, and proposes subsidies for the insurance industry.
Socialists, like me, oppose these things.
2007-11-21 13:33:07 · answer #4 · answered by MarjaU 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't see her as anyone's puppet. I'm not sure she's a socialist either. She was republican before she married Bill, she says different things to different audiences...to be honest we don't really know what she is...I do know she is power hungry, and deceitful. I could never vote for her...
2007-11-20 08:31:30 · answer #5 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
She has always been a Socialist. Look how she controlled her hubby. It's her nature, and to her an asset. I hate saying this, since I can't stand Bill, but he would have been a better president had she not been his wife, and taking his job as president under the guise of his name.
2007-11-20 08:31:24 · answer #6 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 6⤊ 2⤋
She has always had that nature about her even with her first push at Universal Health care when Bill was president. No one was for it. Marxism has no place in modern society.
2007-11-20 08:29:37 · answer #7 · answered by MrOrph 6 · 6⤊ 3⤋
haaaaa You know you like her--come on admit it, a woman in the White House--things could change for the better. Or, is this a clear case of vagina-envy?
2007-11-20 08:30:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
she has always been a socialist, do you not remember her first attempt at socialized medicine?
2007-11-20 08:29:07 · answer #9 · answered by jay f 3 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Have you always been a hillbilly who voted for people like my name, who also enjoys shooting his shotgun, believing the "tax cuts" are for you, and listens to Rush Limpbaugh?
2007-11-20 08:31:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋