i dont have much historic evidence to support it but i very much believe basically they must be true because there is nothing illogical about these epics
2007-11-19 19:40:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is all upto you. It does not matter if they really existed or not. We emulate the ideals with which Rama lived. We learn from what Krishna taught us in Bhagavad gita. The application of those teachings are worth emulating and adopting even in todays modern life. Truth is eternal. If you want people to be good to you, first you should live like Rama who respected every one even those whom the community labelled as the lowest of the low. We should strive to live as Krishna taught us to fight against injustice and establish righteousness - even if we die in fighting for the cause.
The evidence is that these principles apply even today. Just by devotion to God, if a person becomes noble, Religion has done its job.
2007-11-20 03:08:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Arunachalesa 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
there are sages who lived during the period of Rama and Krishna.....and we have writing of this sages in palm leaf even today .........
if the palm leaf and the writing are true then both the personality are true.
you should also understand that the earth landscape undergoes various changes so the evident can vanish during the changes some time you will be able come across those evidence.
Dr.Rao of Archaeology department has discover the city where krishna lived it is now submerged in the sea.
2007-11-20 16:21:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There was a small king in Gosala naadu, that is today's Madyapredesh and part of Uttrapreadesh and his name is rama. Who can not protect his own spouse. She went with another macho man to enjoy her life. All the rest put in the story is bul****** . There were never been a religion called hindu. when the british ruled india they want to separate rest of the herd from Xtian and muslim, and they called by the name hindu kush because that is from were central asians got in to drivida nadu and destroyed their Harappa and mohanchadora civilization. In simple word British colonial masters babtis nomadic as *indu.
2013-09-24 13:23:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Muthu 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hinduism is not a religion. It is a culture, custom, tradition, way of Hindus' lives in Hindustan (India). It is claimed and insisted as such by all the well known Hindu priests, scholars, intellectuals, philosophers, books, scripts, the Ruling Party BJP & Shiv Sena, Bajrang Dal, the Indian and International strongest Hindu organizations RSS & VHP, each and every Hindu, etc.
Hinduism is a very old culture, tradition, custom and way of lives of Hindus in Hindustan (India) for centuries. The Idols and idol worshipping cannot be separated from Hinduism. There are over 330 or 360 millions of Gods and Goddesses in India & millions of temples / shrines with their idols therein. Hundreds of millions of Hindus pray and worship these idols in those temples and shrines.
All, each and every Hindu fights for the IDOL of Lord Rama to be placed in the temple in Ayodhya, to be worshipped & prayed by Hindus. Some modern educated, westernized and over innocent Hindus claim that idol worship is not Hinduism. They are ashamed to face others unnecessarily . They should be proud of their tradition, custom, belief / faith.
2007-11-22 05:59:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
ya i believe and undoubtly its true. recently when the ayoudha was digged pillers and many other things came out.while if u ever got chance to visit mathura there is a temple in red colour i forgot the name its near banke bihari temple & its not been well maintained and cared by govt. of india. in that temple u will find the construction work beyound ur imaginations;it is said that it was build in 1 night & a deepak on the top of it could viewed from delhi.now only 2-3 floors are left as at the time of akbhar it was demolished.most of evidences are now destroyed with time.
2007-11-19 19:19:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by @rvind 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
there are 2 types of events, one is purely imaginery and another is events that occured handed down with some wings of fancies. ramayana and mahabharathas relates to the latter.
stories are so built winners are made the gods for worship. had the opponent won, today we would have been worshipping the then opponents!
2007-11-19 19:30:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by sristi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They may be classic works but there are certain historical evidences about Krishna, as the Madhura Palace and the city of Dwaraka!!
2007-11-19 19:11:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by MRR 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ram and Krishna are the part of a middle aged literature only.. and they exists in religious emotions and literature... nothing else... there is no proof about their true existence.
2007-11-19 19:33:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by bharat p 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes i strongly believe that they all existed. you can judge with your eyes, you have to have insight to feel them.
moreover we have proof also now, You might have heard that NASA sattelites shows the ramsetu, which is of same age when RAMA existed.
Krishna asked for land from varuna(ocean) which was immersed back in sea after krishna left. Dwarika is the name of that city. that is discovered few years back by geologists somwhere near gujrat coastal area.
2007-11-19 19:12:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Meshy Maan 2
·
2⤊
0⤋