This Novak guy is the sleeziest spin artist we've ever seen...
He really managed to get Obama all riled up against Hillary for a minute until Obama wised up and realized he was responding to a Fox tactical maneuver...
It's a damn shame that our Democratic Presidential candidates have to endur trickery and smear campaigns coming from Rupert Murdoch's minions.
Barack Obama can't respond to Fox the way I'm sure he'd like to at this point... but we can...
Will you join me in switching to another channel?
Here's the latest Fox spin on the matter (if you absolutely must hear this garbage from the source...):
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312153,00.html
2007-11-19 18:57:56 · 9 answers · asked by rabble rouser 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes Fox is a lock, stock and barrel servant of the Republican party, devoted first and foremost to electing Republicans and defeating Democrats; it’s even run by a man, Roger Ailes, who helped elect Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and George Bush senior to the presidency. And yet, because it minimally adheres to certain superficial conventions, it can masquerade as a “news” outfit and enjoy all the rights that accrue to that.
2007-11-20 07:09:39 · answer #1 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
WOw so the FACT that Obama came out fighting Hillary 4 months ago was Fox's Doing? well he must be a useless Leader then if four months prior to an interview he caves.......
2007-11-20 05:49:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
One will be the nominee, and
more likely than not, the next PresidentOfTheseUnited(or not-so-united)States.
The other will go back to carving bits of graffitti into a Senate desk.
So no,
I don't think fox is tring to divide them.
2007-11-20 05:11:40 · answer #3 · answered by roostershine 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's really sad that Senator Obama has fallen to the point of using hyperbolic, sleazy, smear tactics that the republicans are famous for using. He might as well re-register as a republican because he is going to lose allot of respect from most people using those tactics.
2007-11-20 05:08:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Clinton and Obama are doing a right good job of dividing themselves without Fox News help. The gnashing of teeth and mud slinging won't slack up until after the primary. You probably wouldn't know that if you watch the Clinton Network News CNN.
2007-11-20 03:23:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Just goes to show that Robert Novak isn't actually a journalist, just a commentary pundit like Bill O'Reilly (as if there weren't enough already.)
2007-11-20 03:17:27 · answer #6 · answered by amg503 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's pathetic, and they claim to be "fair and balanced".
Isn't it hilarious how dick morris flip flopped on the clintons so he can get a paycheck from fox?
2007-11-20 03:19:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
FOX news is a joke, communist china has more impartial news.
2007-11-20 03:01:16 · answer #8 · answered by Gengi 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Barak Obama is relatively OK. But the answer to your question is: no, it's not sad, it is happy.
2007-11-20 03:25:51 · answer #9 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋