2007-11-19 16:32:36 · 10 answers · asked by tdogg29 2 in Sports ➔ Hockey
Regular Season:
608 goals
592 assists
Playoffs:
73 goals
45 assists
19 seasons in the NHL, with 1200 points in the regular season. And 118, in the playoffs.
I think that constitutes a trip to Toronto in November.
2007-11-19 21:14:25 · answer #1 · answered by Justin R 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If people are saying how deserving Eric Lindros is to be in the HOF (yes I've seen some people actually debate this) then Dino Ciccerelli should be.
2007-11-20 03:12:43 · answer #2 · answered by DLG 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely. He was SO great in front of the net. He was the Tomas Holstrom of his time! I loved Dino! Plus he sent me his autograph after I wrote him a letter once!
2007-11-20 00:24:59 · answer #3 · answered by AKA FrogButt 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's his off-ice actions and interaction with the media since his retirement that has Ciccarelli still on the outside. He was never known as a great guy off the ice, or a player who tried to keep friendly with the media during his playing days.
There's nothing that he did on-ice that should keep him out. Like you said, it's tough to deny entry to a guy with 600 goals.
2007-11-19 16:43:29 · answer #4 · answered by Craig S 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Not before Paul Henderson.
2007-11-20 03:23:35 · answer #5 · answered by Coach Scott 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes - 600 goals deserves it - period. The rest is interesting, but doesn't matter.
2007-11-19 18:26:39 · answer #6 · answered by Rich 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
- No Stanley Cups
- No individual hardware
- And the 18th highest points per game average of people not in the hall but eligible means it will be a LONG time before Ciccarelli gets in.
2007-11-19 16:58:20 · answer #7 · answered by Like I'm Telling You Who I A 7 · 6⤊ 2⤋
It's a toss-up great stats, but no cups. His off-ice interactions dont help either.
2007-11-20 00:51:54 · answer #8 · answered by Advice 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he gets in ever, then HOLMSTROM is a lock.
Dino will not get in. Period
2007-11-19 23:17:20 · answer #9 · answered by Siggy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. It's not important.
2007-11-19 16:40:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋