I was just wondering what you guys thought? Many people often say that the video game Everything or Nothing should have been made into a movie. I know that Pierce Brosnon wanted to do another one. What do you all think? Thanks!!!
2007-11-19 16:32:21 · 11 answers · asked by JarlinFo 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I liked Pierce as Bond and I also like the new, tougher Daniel Craig as well. I was very used to Pierce as Bond and I liked his modern suaveness and appearance he added to the series. It was a little unfair how Pierce was, I think, fired from the role. Oh Well, That's Hollywood For You!!!!!!!
2007-11-19 16:47:36 · update #1
I was pleasantly surprised by Daniel Craig -- he was good! But I still have big issues with the way they handled Pierce Brosnan -- he was an EXCELLENT Bond and deserved better. Besides, supposedly the reason they changed Bonds was because they wanted to start over with a YOUNGER Bond -- and tell me -- does Craig look ANY younger than Brosnan? I don't think so! Brosnan is TO DIE FOR handsome and Craig -- well, he just isn't.
2007-11-19 16:52:08 · answer #1 · answered by luvrats 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brosnan was BORN to play Bond! The nerve of those mugs! He got busted up during "Die Another Day" leaping onto one of those hydro-water-mud-slide-glide-thing-a-ma-bobbers, and like, slices an arm off, and after his Bond films gross over a billion $ worldwide, they won't pay him a crummy $10 million for the best script (Casino Royale) they'd had in years!
That said, legend has it that Bond films carry so much weight worldwide, and the ad "perks" are so swell, (chicks, too), the role doesn't pay nearly as well as other mainstream franchises. They want to put every nickel on screen that they can. While I can understand that, Brosnan deserved better, seems to me.
"Evelyn" was beautiful, I thought. A fine family film. "Robinson Crusoe" was a masterpiece, in my humble opinion. An outstanding achievement in filmaking - truly! "The Matador"? What - are you kidding me? Magnificent!
I myself would like to see Brosnan make more westerns - with a continuing character, like the "Man With No Name" or "Trinity" trilogies. That'd be swell!
Whatever you do - best of luck, Commander.
2007-11-19 18:59:36 · answer #2 · answered by tony key / tony romero 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was good, but I think I like Daniel Craig a little bit better. He's more the classic Sean Connery type Bond.
2007-11-19 16:36:36 · answer #3 · answered by Jess 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't really like pierce brosnan but i guess he was an ok bond but daniel craig is the reason i started liking james bond movies
2007-11-19 18:30:27 · answer #4 · answered by chucky's niece 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pierce waited a long time to be Bond. Bond was a dream role for him. I was glad he had the opportunity to do it and yes, I'd like to see him don his tux again.
2007-11-19 18:43:30 · answer #5 · answered by kimberleyelizabeth 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that Pierce's time had come. He was not aging well and I think they really needed to reinvent the franchise to give it more life. They now can dump all the continuity issues and start fresh - even though they inexplicably kept the same M.
2007-11-22 02:13:02 · answer #6 · answered by Shadow Knight 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I liked Pierce in Remington Steele. As Bond he was a disaster I thought.
2007-11-19 16:35:43 · answer #7 · answered by cougar_mccxxi 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah. He had to get past all that Remington Steele nonsense. But it's okay. At least we can catch him in non James Bond stuff. That franchise is on its last legs anyway.
2007-11-19 16:52:56 · answer #8 · answered by mithril 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sure, Brosnan grew to become into very extremely starting to be the suitable Bond yet. nevertheless, i'm finding forward to seeing D Craig in action - Lot of individuals brushing off him yet want to work out it earlier I criticise.
2016-10-17 11:43:38 · answer #9 · answered by dotel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would have been nice...but I think Daniel Craig is doing a great job.
2007-11-19 16:35:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋