2007-11-19
15:52:10
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Chi Guy
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
danielle (below) So basically, you don't care who is president, as long as there is an R by his/her name. Got it.
2007-11-19
15:58:11 ·
update #1
commande (below) You consider me a "liberal" LOLOLOL
Then what do you consider Rudy Giuliani?
2007-11-19
15:59:38 ·
update #2
TC (below) ALL neo-cons support Bush.
Also, it is refreshing to see True Conservatives anytime.
2007-11-19
16:00:52 ·
update #3
danielle (below) Yes. BRAVO!
2007-11-19
16:01:28 ·
update #4
Good questin CG. He shold at least make a token jesture at putting up some fence in the high drug areas, which leads me to believe that the NA Trade Agreement is a done deal like the Hal contracts for Iraq. It is insane as 70%+ off the people polled even in NY seem to want to put a stop to it. At least stop some of the stuff. Idiots. With this Congress it would not work anyway as they (demos) control. What a nightmare.
2007-11-19 17:15:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by R J 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Neoconservatism is a logical results of what Republicans have continually stood for because of the fact the 2d international conflict with as absolute backside factor the Reagan social bloodbath and remote places coverage hypocrisy. Later got here Newt with the classic tax scheme reinvented. The Necons are no longer something new and that i've got not got faith united statesa. desires "actual" conservatives. united statesa. desires a push to the left. through underfunding considered necessary government centers to the fringe of fall down they teach government is inefficient and the loose marketplace is often extra advantageous. they do no longer fund impressive and then use the inevitable undesirable service as a reason to fund it even much less or perhaps abolish it. the only concern the yank good is sturdy at is PR because of the fact the above occasion of perverse means politics isn't recognized as such through maximum human beings yet welcomed because of the fact the hollow low taxes rhetoric. info are Republicans are for massive funds and don't care approximately basic human beings in spite of if or no longer they're Democrats or Republicans
2016-10-17 11:39:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
To neoconservative leadership, the Republican Party is expendable so long as it executes the Likud agenda of regime change in Iraq, Iran and Syria.
They appear to own Hillary and Rudy, too, via Rupert Murdoch.
To neocon voters, they don't have a clue what's really going on.
2007-11-19 16:07:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by CaesarLives 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
No one is destroying the Republican party. It is alive and well. There are far more conservatives in this country than liberals.
2007-11-19 18:23:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why are the Liberals praising Clinton and Soros as they turn the Democrats into the New Communist party?
2007-11-19 16:08:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Bush has accomplished nearly everything the International Corporate Fascist Movement required of him.
They may actually put him on Mount Rushmore.
2007-11-19 16:06:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well, if he destroys the republican party from within, the Democrats will rise (holla), and the repubs will have no one to blame but themselves for electing that idiot. Although I am sure some will blame the Dems.
2007-11-19 16:06:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Senator D*L*P™ 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
Daily drinking of the kool-aid (Rush and Fox) over the years tends to dull the brain. Current dittoheads are not able to engage in critical thinking.
They just follow and wave the pom-poms.
2007-11-19 16:04:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by expose_neocons 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
They only want to win.. they would run a monkey if they thought it would help.. oh wait.. they did.. and look at the mess we are in!
2007-11-19 16:19:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Debra H 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
What would you have him rather be, a dipwod like Paul, who wants to make us be isolationist all over again. Great thinking. At least Bush has tried to do something about terrorism, unlike som I could mention.
2007-11-19 16:06:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋