2007-11-19 14:05:04 · 4 answers · asked by Ant 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
One is to rationalize the ever shifting target, to find a new basis as needed, vs a belief that is was wrong at the start, and new situations, does not change the innate wrong on which it was based.
2007-11-19 14:31:56 · answer #1 · answered by Songbyrd JPA ✡ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Which war?
The only single war I can think of that can come close to being considered "the" war would be WWII.
From what I've learned the philosophies of the following countries were:
Germany - we don't have to put up with this, we're better then them.
Britain - oh man, why don't they just settle down
France - HELP!
Russia - oh goodie now we can really get somewhere
Poland - HELP!
USA - crap, if they take over that whole hemisphere then they're gonna come over here aren't they
Japan - yes Emperor
To tell you the truth, I really don't know enough to even guess the philosophies of the other nations involved in the conflict so I guess I can only give you this partial answer, sorry. (my observations on the nations I've listed are probably inaccurate too, but I hope they are close enough to help.)
2007-11-19 23:09:46 · answer #2 · answered by U Betcha 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there aren't any philosophies behind the war
it's all economic and geopolitical interests (aka oil and access to it)
2007-11-19 23:02:12 · answer #3 · answered by mcd 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we are different than them
2007-11-19 22:32:20 · answer #4 · answered by D D 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋