Which means they were scraping the bottom of the barrel. What will the next pair be like? Kind of frightening isn't it?
2007-11-19 13:37:13 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The Republican flock have all become infected with syphilis and have become blind and will vote ever how their Shepard Lush Numballs tells them to.
2007-11-20 04:39:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well lets see, had it been someone else as President, would we be saying the same things. Other than Bush's speaking abilities(at times), whoever would have been president for the past 7 years would have been tainted. 3000+ people were murdered, everyone was calling for action, we went in, stirred up a hornets nest, now we're trying to come out of this whole fiasco on top.
The sad thing is, US media doesn't report all of the news, b/c US media is controlled by politics. People keep saying that we need to be in Afghanistan and not in Iraq, well, there are fewer troops in Iraq (personally known fact).
It's sad when naive people make erroneous statements.
2007-11-19 21:57:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The problem today is that politics is like being a rock star or a movie star. You take somebody with charisma, an ability to read a speech, some acting and communication skills and you have a president people will elect. Nobody asks the hard questions anymore. Nobody sees the real substance behind the person. It's all scripted, it's all fake and phoney. That is why Bush is such a failure, ultimately he was like a boy band member, he started to believe he could actually sing.
2007-11-19 21:47:07 · answer #3 · answered by Jackie Oh! 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
They assembled an impressive team, and I think that swayed many repubs . They weren't the bottom of barrel in 2000. As long as we have computer voting and corporate owned media, can we ever truly be sure? This election is still up for grabs, sorry.
2007-11-19 21:45:34 · answer #4 · answered by Peter R 4 · 6⤊ 0⤋
No, they weren't.
Bush should have left Chaney as the guy helping to find a VP candidate, not as the VP.
Big mistake by a guy that is far too loyal to underlings, as seen with Powell, Gonzalas, Harriet Myers, and the Generals that ran Iraq before Petraeus.
Bush is a lib. The next Republican won't be so able to fool the public. he will be conservative, or a one term guy.
2007-11-19 21:57:40 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not really.
Bush and Cheney took on the worst attack on American soil and we rebounded.
We took the fight to them rather than waiting for the next one.
Now look at what the DNC had to offer.
Al Gore who work of fiction has gotten him a Nobel Peace Prize.
He is racking in the money selling the snake oil call "carbon credits"
It shows me the right choice was made in 2000 and in 2004
2007-11-19 21:59:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well they did BEAT the libs twice so agin who scraped the bottom
2007-11-19 22:12:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
In a country with allot of talented and intelligent people, I often wonder with regards to either party is this is what we get to choose from???? This year is a bit better, but not much.
2007-11-19 21:53:43 · answer #8 · answered by Bill W 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
But, they beat out the competition, meaning that if they are the bottom of the barrel, the Democratic candidates were under the barrel. Kind of depressing for the Democrats, isn't it?
2007-11-19 21:41:49 · answer #9 · answered by notanotary 2 · 10⤊ 4⤋
If Gore had won in 2000 he would have bent over, spread really wide and apologized to Bin Laden for any wrongs he felt we had done.
2007-11-19 21:57:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋