I personally think that he was involved.
the evidence is right there?
What do you think and why?
2007-11-19 13:03:56 · 17 answers · asked by oscarrr 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
I don't think that LBJ was involved in the killing of JFK. I think he was wrong to trick us into getting more involved in the Vietnam war.
Believe me, if this could have been proved--it would have been by the newspapers. LBJ had plenty of critics.
2007-11-19 13:20:55 · answer #1 · answered by redunicorn 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think the United State's goverment was involved.
Much simliar to the Ides of March where Caesar was stabbed all the way back in 44 BC.
I'm saying, History repeats itself.
JFK was threatening to expose secret societies which our fair goverment was dying to protect, so somebody hired Oswald to do their dirty work.
It was a scam, seriously.
Now, if LBJ was involved directly, i'm not sure.
But he's so somber swearing in on the plane was probably an act.
Who's sad when they get to be the next conformist presidant?
2007-11-19 13:33:49 · answer #2 · answered by pepsi_chugger8899 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"...the evidence is right there"
What evidence?
What kind of conspiracy nut have you been listening to?
I detested LBJ, but I never have felt that he had any involvement in Kennedy's assassination.
Credentials: In college when JFK assassinated. Deputy Sheriff working riots after Bobby & MLK assassinated. Had to help provide security for LBJ. Marched against the war in 1970.
***
2007-11-19 13:12:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Personnally I do, but can I prove it? Well the link will provide an interesting read.
I find it interesting that JFK was killed in Dallas. LBJ and JFK were political rivals; JFK choose LBJ to be his running mate to help carry the conservative deep South.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/300806jfk.htm
2007-11-19 13:51:44 · answer #4 · answered by Sambo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
forget the Christian Liberal attitude! Your arguments for a central authority plot are somewhat susceptible to non-existent. It makes no distinction in spite of if one is a Muslim conservative or a Libertarian. that's hogwash. Do you apart from mght have faith that the moon landing photos have been shot interior a television studio? How a pair of Bush/government plot that ended in 9/11? Conspiracy nuts attempt to manufacture a conspiracy out of basically approximately each and every important experience and then drag in a gaggle of supporters such as you who hear to their media rants and purchase their books. discover some thing helpful to do mutually with your existence.
2016-10-17 08:15:45 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
The JFK assassination was a hobby of mine a few years ago and I read a ton of stuff about it.
I've come to my own personal conclusion that it was just a 'lone kook'(Oswald) who was interested in working for the KGB (who originally turned him down) and wanted to increase his 'KGB credentials' by killing the president.
The problem was he got caught, then shot, before he could go back to the Russians with his 'updated resume'.
Basically, Oswald was a nobody that wanted to be a somebody.
2007-11-19 13:09:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he was directly involved; however, I also think that those that were directly involved didn't know what they were getting when they got LBJ. LBJ ended up pushing through JFK's liberal rights issues. he may have screwed up Viet Nam, but he did one hell of a good job for social reform
2007-11-19 13:12:50 · answer #7 · answered by RT 66 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Read the article at the link below. Vincent Bugliosi really did his research.
2007-11-19 13:11:37 · answer #8 · answered by Porch 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, he wasn't. Plain and simple, it was Lee Harvey Oswald - not LBJ, not the mafia, not Castro. I know that isn't as fun as conspiracy theories, but it just ain't so.
2007-11-19 13:07:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Only to take over as President.
2007-11-19 13:07:45 · answer #10 · answered by thresher 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋