Really disappointed with the low calibre journalism from Panorama. This was no better than Dispatches and revealed nothing new.
I switched off half way through to watch Dragons Den as I felt that this was little more than a McCann propoganda stunt. Panorama's reporter was straight out of the Blue Peter school of journalism.
Doesn't it make your blood boil that license payers cash was used to produce this trash?
2007-11-19 09:13:05 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
It was exactly as l expected---------another McCann publicity stunt,but this one was so shallow that it was laughable,l bet that Clarence Mitchell was delighted with its lack of content,if l had a paint brush l would help with a coat of whitewash.
2007-11-19 09:34:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hardly any Licence Payers money was used to produce last night panorama. The Licence Payer just paid for Geremy Vine to stand up and get paid for doing not a lot, the credits/graphics & some bloke standing on a beach in Portugal for an hour.
The main film was made privately by a small business film produce that the McCanns happen to (kate knows his wife) know.
So shut up.
2007-11-20 04:37:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you want something refreshingly different, see this:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AvPRDDhfwi2sRvJ9V1f_2wPsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071119135351AAQbo1c
One thing I did learn --- that the car they hired 25 days after the disappearance clocked many miles while they were travelling in the Vatican... that the car was hired ONE day before they flew to the Vatican... and that together with the scent of death detected by British dogs in the boot of the car, UNDER the boot carpet but not through the boot carpet
2007-11-19 17:31:37 · answer #3 · answered by RED-CHROME 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Panorama does not reveal. It brings facts together in a way which induces British sensationalism to the extreme.
2007-11-19 17:21:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
lol yeah. Much better that the money is spent not on documentaries but on I'm Not Strictly A Dancing Celebrity Get Me To The Big Brother Jungle.
2007-11-19 17:20:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yep and I'm going to complain that they spent my licence money on a biased programmed 'authorised' by the two MAIN SUSPECTS in the disapearance of a young child
2007-11-19 17:26:05 · answer #6 · answered by 17pdr 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I don't know about that - I learned that the forensic evidence may be too inconclusive to get a conviction. It seems that we may never find out exactly what happened to Maddy.
2007-11-19 17:17:55 · answer #7 · answered by Alsanja 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
poor BBC programme,still dosent convince me there innocent
2007-11-19 17:19:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
yes it does.
2007-11-19 17:16:55 · answer #9 · answered by nicole b 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
AAWW!!
2007-11-19 17:16:09 · answer #10 · answered by Chris 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋