I have Jamal Crawford but Kirk Hinrick just came on waivers. Kirk has been struggling but he should turn it around. Who would you rather have Jamal or Kirk and why?
2007-11-19 08:39:22 · 11 answers · asked by Michael H 1 in Sports ➔ Basketball
If you need assists go for Hinrich, if you want rebounding go for Crawford. Its really that simple, they both are about the same in other categories, Crawford has a slight advantage in scoring but also shoots a little lower percentage. Steals are equal and FT% is equal. I say Crawford because he went to Michigan, but that doesn't mean the same as it used too.
2007-11-19 09:36:40 · answer #1 · answered by capdaddy81 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kirk would be better but look at the numbers, jamal crawford is on my team and he is consistant with a good 20 points a game so i wud go with jamal
2007-11-19 09:03:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both
Jamal is also on my fantasy team and he's been great. Kirk is in a funk and you should definately pick him up. He'll dish for you really well being on a team with Deng, Gordon and Wallace.
I would rather have Kirk on my team because he stays healthy and is a great rebounding pg, also a good shooter when he has his stroke. Jamal is a little streaky and he was out most of last year and is injury prone.
Look for kirk to turn it around, definately add him
2007-11-19 08:50:19 · answer #3 · answered by chetty_29 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like Jamal Crawford, good player best out of the Knicks when it actually comes to knocking down shots!!!!
2007-11-19 10:21:52 · answer #4 · answered by Amo la pallacanestro 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hinrich. greater consistent (a minimum of he would be as quickly as he gets his had on in the present day) and neither of them have very sturdy FG% yet Kirk gets you a truthful quantity of assists. besides the incontrovertible fact that, save your eye on Jamal simply by fact if Marbury is going as factor look after, Jamal's PG sources immediately come into play.
2016-09-29 13:09:12 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you wanna get kirk later but not now, deng is out, gordon is also in a shooting slump, kirk doesnt have anyone to pass the ball to for some assists, stick with crawford, once the bulls get a 2 game win streak then look for kirk, but look at his stats ans what you need b4 you make your decision
2007-11-19 09:07:51 · answer #6 · answered by junior v 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right now I would rather have Jamal Crawford he is playin very well
2007-11-19 08:59:00 · answer #7 · answered by Antwuan (Giants Superbowl XLVI Champs!!!) 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You likely have someone worse than Crawford to dump. I would find a way to have them both.
2007-11-19 10:53:40 · answer #8 · answered by turninaduece 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Crawford is a beast and will be even better if they really get rid of Starbury. Kirk will lose points once Deng gets back into form.
Please answer my basketball research question- http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AvRE9Gjbs88OfHFQKpAN6k_sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071119105143AATfegk
2007-11-19 09:36:07 · answer #9 · answered by Leff_NutZ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i have hinrich on my team and i've seriously been dissappointed by him. all his numbers are way down.
in fact if he has one more bad game im trading him for raymond felton.
2007-11-19 10:50:08 · answer #10 · answered by armondo28 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋