McCann guff regurgitated from the UK government funded spin machine? The fact remains that the most credible source of information about what has been done to Madeline is the PJ police who have made the McCanns suspects, this (unless you are a racist pro McCann) is undeniable
2007-11-19 07:54:39 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Ali free speach is the basis of democrasy, you are against free speach and therefore against democrasy, you have taken the Hackneyed phrase Innocent out of the court room and hence out of context, it does not mean a crime has not been commited, nor that an investigation should be hampered untill it is proved in a court of law, in essence you are unable even to think straight let alone form a view
2007-11-19 08:14:09 · update #1
Loads of newspapers have said stuff wand proved how guilty the McCanns are it's just you refuse to acnoledge it as you are a racicst pro McCann, you are unable to even think straight lett alone say what is true and what is not. the McCscumm *"lost"* their children undebatable therefore they are involved. another inane argument from you
2007-11-19 08:39:59 · update #2
no newspaper has been sued yet and lost, nor will one be
2007-11-19 08:44:53 · update #3
Why don't you get a life? All you do is post about the McCanns. Does your getting upset change anything even one iota? Give it a rest.
Please.
.
2007-11-19 08:05:10 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 10⤊ 1⤋
I for one am not a little tired of the let's gaol 'em now brigade and I suspect that so are many others. This often means that even if a contributor is not necessarily a fan of Maddie's parents the arguments tend to lead us all into rather extreme defences. I do not particularly care for you bringing in the racists bit and could suggest that it means you can not see the flaws in your own augment
2007-11-19 17:20:38 · answer #2 · answered by Scouse 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
For the avoidance of doubt she is referring to me.
She thinks I am a pro McCann because I believe in the founding principles of democracy
A person is innocent until proven guilty.
Not true I am very much for democracy. I am not saying that you cannot express your opinions. The only thing I object about your opinions is that you cannot back them up. If you can back them up with one little piece of solid evidence then I will willingly admit that I am wrong.
If you sent what you have been saying into a newspaper for example you would end up in court and you would lose.
2007-11-19 16:10:38 · answer #3 · answered by Alistair 6 · 11⤊ 3⤋
Did you get withdraw symptons during that hour you were watching tv,bet you will be on here all night wont you posting your,e rubbish.
2007-11-19 18:18:57 · answer #4 · answered by pauline will never give up.xx 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Double negative - dat iz bad English you know.
The PJ beat women into confessions, trample footprints all over crime scenes, fail to carry out proper searches, use vital evidence as an ash tray, etc etc etc.
They have zero credibility - like your spelling lol
2007-11-19 16:01:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 2⤋
I have always been pro find Madeleine & pro McCann. I don't need any spin or other people to tell what I should and shouldn't believe in.
Could you define how that makes me a racist?
2007-11-19 16:01:12 · answer #6 · answered by Tabbyfur aka patchy puss 5 · 10⤊ 3⤋
Madone de mia
2007-11-19 16:50:37 · answer #7 · answered by HarleyRider 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What the hell has race got to do with anything,how silly you are.
2007-11-19 16:57:32 · answer #8 · answered by Pat R 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
stop obsessing over the mccanns!!!!
2007-11-19 16:10:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 1⤋
too much spin
lies lies lies
leaks leaks leaks
how can people be so sure - pro or anti?
we can only guess............and hope that the child is alive......
we might find out eventually.............
2007-11-19 16:04:45 · answer #10 · answered by Tequila.... 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋