Many felt that if hart and henne were 100% strong that ohio state would have lost by a touchdown or more. Do their victories decrease the significance of ohio state victory.
2007-11-19 07:37:21 · 11 answers · asked by Scott 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
i don't think so. Michigan and OSU fans don't look at that stuff all we look at is who is the winner of the game. anything else doesn't matter.
OSU won and has bragging rights for a year plain and simple. For Michigan fans to go around saying if we were healthy we would have beat you by 7 is a ludicrous statement. it dosen't matter because it didn't happen and we will never know.
2007-11-19 07:41:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe you'll do it, you'll just stop posting for awhile. Anyway, Michigan won't win. Saying Ohio State won't win because they've only played bad teams is a retarded reasoning that only idiot fans of loser teams use. Anyone who's watched Ohio State play has seen a team that has dominated every game, which is something neither Michigan nor most other highly rated teams can say. Michigan NEEDS to put up a ton of points because their defense is so bad, anyone can score on them. Ohio State has an efficient offense that can score 30 points against anyone. Do you really think Michigan can put up 31 or more points on the highest rated defense in the country? I don't. Ohio State will win by 2 touchdowns.
2016-04-04 22:48:16 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh brother! That's giving those two a tad too much credit.
If they didn't (or couldn't) stick with the run game, they could have used Arrington or Manningham. Where were THEY? Oh yeah. Dropping passes in the flat.
The entire team looked sluggish - healthy or not.
Trust and believe - any victory over U of M is great. But don't misunderstand me...I'm not *glad* the two of them were hurt. It really is unfortunate....but if a program has ANY depth, they can seamlessly replace players and be just as successful. Apparently they didn't have that luxury and it showed.
2007-11-19 07:47:00 · answer #3 · answered by YSIC 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
but I don't think they would have, it would have been closer but that doesn't matter, this game is always significant, anyone who is from Ohio or Michigan knows that. There will be all these people on here from the south that don't get how big this rivalry is to both teams.
Nobody wanted them injured but I don't think they would have made that much of a difference.
2007-11-19 07:51:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I doubt that any of Michigan's victories over OSU were any less significant when we had a soft headed half wit for a coach. OSU had players who were starters who didn't play in the game either.
2007-11-19 08:01:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Are you kidding? Are you new to this country? A victory over Michigan is a victory over Michigan. Period.
2007-11-19 07:47:52 · answer #6 · answered by Patrick H 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋
just a typical mich fans,since hart and henning were less than 100 % guess there using that as a excuse ,what about the last 4 years?
2007-11-19 23:02:22 · answer #7 · answered by tornadoman1955 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The game might have been closer.
Ohio won plain and simple.
See ya next year.
GO BLUE!!!!!
2007-11-19 08:18:15 · answer #8 · answered by HockeyFan 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, OSU deserves to be where they are. Michigan had a tough year with injuries, but a win is a win is a win.
2007-11-19 08:01:35 · answer #9 · answered by mJc 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Not for Ohio State fans.
Beating Michigan was a NC game for them.
Them beating Michigan saved 95% of Columbus from committing suicide!
2007-11-19 07:42:00 · answer #10 · answered by mr_cj_jr 6 · 3⤊ 5⤋