What was President Bush's motive for demolishing the World Trade Center?

Question

Three buildings collapsed. One plane each struck only two. The third was not hit by anything. If you examine the footage, you can see plainly that they were the result of a controlled demolition. The way the buildings crimp inward is the result of set charges being fired to blow the primary supports so that the building will collapse inward on top of itself. It is the same method used in every demolition of every tall building everywhere. The firefighters reported seeing pools of molten steel in the sub-basements for weeks afterward. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel molten. It burns about 500 degrees cooler than is required to melt steel. How can this be explained? Why would President Bush want to kill innocent Americans and begin a war based on a heinous lie?

Answer 1

It was blocking the mind control ray he is about to point at you.

The only defense is to wrap your head with a lot of aluminum foil.

Answer 2

Firstly, Bush is a puppet and whoever really organised 911 certainly did so years in advance. To focus on towers one and two, I've seen and studied the youtube footage on the 'demolition'. I'm not fully convinced though. The twin towers were constructed differently to older more conventional concrete frame structures, to which the WTC collapses have been compared. As you state, aviation fuel burns at 500 degrees cooler than required to melt the steel. There are still reasons why the structure may have failed. The initial impacts of the planes hit the exoskeleton and the core, significantly weakening both. The fire was started by the fuel but the burning a cocktail of substances within the building could have caused areas to burn hotter than the fuel itself. This could explain the failing of the inner core. A large building fire will create vibrations that if close to the resonant frequency of the structure, will cause more damage. Its worth noting that almost all tower demolition jobs are on concrete frame structures. Assuming the inner structure failed first, then the way the buildings collapsed is entirely plausible. The weakened exoskeleton would have been carrying all the weight at this point and once it ruptured[at the first point where the collapse occured] the columns would have all failed simultaneously, due to the weight of 110 floors. This can be seen on close inspection where the whole thing 'rips' starting from a single column. There appears to be no outward blast until after this point. Also, lining the entire building with explosives would be an extremely difficult, even impossible operation without getting caught 'red handed' so to speak. The outward puffs of gas are easily explained as the collapsing storeys all contain air and other materials which needs to escape somehow. Notice this is not mentioned on the youtube videos. Also the speed at which the building fell is consistent with physics baring in mind that it is not the conventional concrete frame building, which would have taken longer to fall and couldn't have collapsed inward without the help of explosives. WTC7 on the other hand would have been weakened by the first two collapses and was on fire inside. Again, the internal materials that were present would dictate the heat of the fire. Maybe the molten metal was not steel? I guess we'll never know for sure. Anything I have said above does not detract from the idea that it was known or even setup internally. To find those responsible we have to look at the possible motives and those with the abilities to do so. Injecting fear into society appears to be the central motive. CIA certainly knew something was up and may have blood on their hands. The Zeitgeist movie suggests the hidden leaders of the central bank are responsible, as war earns them more money. Israeli secret services are the other possible suspects, for obvious reasons. But for all the finger pointing, if bin laden didn't do it, why wouldn't he deny responsibility? My own belief is that all of the above are responsible in one way or another and due to their secret natures and states inability to prosecute we'll probably never truly know.

Answer 3

Not sure if I believe the conspricay theory 100%, BUT remember: Some say President Roosevelt knew the Japanese were going to attack Pearl Harbor and this was the only way the U.S. public would have supported entering WWII after having been devistated by the Great Depression.

Most Americans can't allow themselves to believe conspiracies can be real. They'd rather focus on business as usual, which is what Giulliani said we should all do after 9/11. That's what people want despite any recent event that suggests something has gone seriously wrong with the U.S. government and somehow after Nixon's era political corruption is acceptable by the apathetic. You have to remember that most people are too narrow minded to consider if there is any indicator that Bush or the pentagon were aware of what was going to happen on 9/11, which would make tham part conspirators. They feel content screaming: Where's the evidence, but the evidence was cleaned up pretty quickly and now they're constructing a new monument to freedom while the U.S. military is still bombing the Middle East at will. Coincidence?

Never mind the conspiracy to take down the WTC. Look at what happened afterwards!


By the way, from below (a marine "trained" in demolitions, sure) : "So when the top floors gave due to the heat and explosions, they collapsed onto the floors below, which were not engineered for that weight. And so you have this domino effect, forcing the building floors down, which pushed the air out from the open floors...this is what made it appear as though it was blowing out." The top floors gave way to heat? A building can't collapse inward and pancake style straight down to the ground without either an act of God or some other form of compensation. The problem is there was no real investigation of the rubble. No evidence means no evidence.

Answer 4

I really love you guys. Its like taking candy from a baby.

Answer a few questions for yourself, if you can't answer these I understand.

1) when did bush begin planning this attack?

2) how many other people knew about it?

3) how many pounds of explosives were wired into the buildings?

4) how many miles of wire had to be secretly run?

5) how many people were involved in wiring the explosives?

6) Why didn't anyone get suspicious of these explosive experts?

7) why is this the only secret bush has been able to keep?

8) why do all controlled demolitions start at the bottom but these all started exactly where the airplanes hit?

Answer 5

I saw the footage and had a Professor at UW-Seattle try to make the same embarrassing argument you have. They are NOT controlled explosives. Not in any way, shape or form. The amount needed to bring those two buildings down would have left hundreds, if not thousands, of miles of det.cord and wiring...which would have raised only a few red flags to those working at the buildings that day. The WTC buildings were not fashioned like conventional buildings, which utilize a inner-structure of pillars and beams to support the weight from within. The walls were stouter, which supported the weight from the outside. This opened up their floor space, thereby increasing revenue. So when the top floors gave due to the heat and explosions, they collapsed onto the floors below, which were not engineered for that weight. And so you have this domino effect, forcing the building floors down, which pushed the air out from the open floors...this is what made it appear as though it was blowing out. As for the Molten steel part, that ones easy. Why, does the tar on your roof burn at a set temperature higher than the wood frame within your house....shouldn't the tar on the roof NOT catch fire, since it requires more heat to get going? Firefighters weren't used to seeing molten steel, however, this example I gave they would be more familiar with. You had several factors involved: High winds, jet fuel as an accelerant, and the available structures making contact with the heat. The fire retardent was blown off the steel in the top floors, and the intense heat of the jet fuel induced fire in conjunction with the high winds weakened the steel (ultimately causing them to give), but also causing them to become compromised by the heat and flame to the point of melting. The fires were isolated to the top floors, and when the building collapsed, these molten beams (which is what they found, not pools of molten steel) would be heavily insulated within the debris. As for three buildings falling...this is proof positive against a controlled demolition, as the third building had one of the towers strike its foundation, which lead to its gradual demise...since they all shared the same foundation and underground parking. Its not rocket science, one you look at the facts and have an understanding at what is actually taking place rather than engaging with the fanatical fringes.

Answer 6

Bush had the same motive for 9/11 as FDR had for allowing the attack on Pearl Harbor.

You don't have to melt steel only weaken it. I've personally bent 3/4 inch steel rods just by heating them in the coals of a campfire. Without the heating process we'd have need a hydraulic press, as it was I only needed a 5 pound hammer. Blacksmiths melted steel long before the invention of jet fuel.

Remember the jet fuel only started the fire, if it was the only thing to burn the fires would've quickly burned themselves out.

It was all the carpet, office furniture, plastics and what ever else was in those buildings that kept it going. Who's to say if all those support members taken out by the initial collisions were still there the towers would still be standing despite the fires.

Answer 7

It seems most unlikely. Even the American press would find it difficult to keep that one from the public. All the same, here is a further question to add to the list already given

Who was in charge of security at the World Trade Centre at the time? A clue - one of the Bush brothers.

Answer 8

do remember when bill Clinton shut down the military base ? well the man wanted to prove that we need them this man in the white house is a killer and remember?when no could leave or come in the united states well this man let the bin laden fly back home yes this man committed genocide on amercia.for what oil and money .he dose talk about bin laden at all the reason why is because bin laden is a very close to the bush family he bought bush oil wells this man made the rich richer and the poor poorer

Answer 9

Simple minded people often team up with this bs about a controlled demolition. Pure non-sesnse from the very ectremist trying to take away our rights.

Answer 10

Probably the gold bars hidden in the basement and owned by private companies. A strong box was found bust open and contents missing. Owners of box said it had lots of gold bars worth millions in it.

Check the White House war chest.

Answer 11

We are demolition experts, so we don't really understsand the heat involved here and why a building colapses
don't loose too much sleep