You know it'll happen. The drums are already beating.
2007-11-19 04:32:30 · 26 answers · asked by Earl Grey 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
they are already blaming the dems for iraq by claiming the desire to bring the troops home is "cut and run," or a de facto surrender to our enemies.
apparently, the only way to win this thing is to leave our troops over there as decoys until the indurgents run out of IEDs.
its a darn good thing we arent trying to resolve this trrough diplomacy they way that stupid iraq study group suggested!
2007-11-19 04:43:12 · answer #1 · answered by Archduke Gumbercules 2 · 6⤊ 4⤋
No spin needed, the Democrats are doing all the work for the Republicans on this. With all the good news, signs of improvement, and troop draw down all going on now the Dems decided not to fund the war and will not take p this issue again until after the new year. They see that the war is being won and that the president's new strategy is working and it scares them. They know that if Iraq succeeds the American people will look at them for what they have become, Scheisters. The Democrats make empty promises, tell the country bold face lies, and have done absolutely nothing since they took Congress.
They are losing their power and are trying with everything they have to retain it, even if it means sabatoging the troops in Iraq by cutting their funding
2007-11-19 04:48:50 · answer #2 · answered by Tip 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
There's no spinning to be done. All the yellow-bellied Democrats in Congress sucked President Bush's socks when he proposed invading Iraq, without any hesitation, and THEY ALL jumped on the Bush wagon. Very few representatives had the balls to stand up to the president and guess what... they were Republicans! So there you go.... The Democrats are to blame for us being in Iraq.
2007-11-19 04:48:17 · answer #3 · answered by Estrella E 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
This should have happened the very first time Saddam took a shoot at a UN fighter plane patrolling the no fly zone has agreed in the cease fire.
2007-11-19 04:55:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hey I am a drummer and I don't like your tie in...And based on how well I play, the tempo will surely increase ...You know what they call a guy who hangs out with musicians? A drummer... Why did the drummer leave his sticks on the dash when he parked? To prove he was handicapped...What do you call a drummer without a girlfriend? Homeless...
2007-11-19 04:55:43 · answer #5 · answered by Raymond C 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Simple: Democrats want to cut-and-run, therefore, it is costing the United States more money to fund the war effort.
Convoluted, but mark my words!
2007-11-19 06:54:45 · answer #6 · answered by docscholl 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Fox the no spin zone can spin better then any of them . I am almost sure we will get the blame.
2007-11-19 04:56:52 · answer #7 · answered by RELAX 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, we can't possibly do that because to date the Democrats have not done or proposed 1 worthwhile thing for Iraq. They have simply done nothing, which is why you should avoid them on voting day. They can't even get their base's wish to end the war, and they have a majority in the Congress!
2007-11-19 04:47:28 · answer #8 · answered by Pfo 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
The media will distort it a lot (as you well know). but we have to be careful about whose BEHIND the scenes, regardless of party association.
Two sides of the same coin.
2007-11-19 06:32:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The democrats have been nothing but obstuctionists when it comes to Iraq. They all read the same intelligence prior to the invasion and agreed that Sadaam was evil. It wasnt a lie by the Bush administration - thats just bunk by this democrat party. There are no drums beating for any such blame game. You have been listening to Al Gore and Nancy Pelosi too much.
2007-11-19 04:37:41 · answer #10 · answered by Devdude 5 · 7⤊ 7⤋