http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1678661,00.html?xid=feed-cnn-topics
It is obvious these articles are extremely biased and are trying to make Ron Paul supporters appear as "nerds"? They even call the college students nerds for wearing t-shirts with Ron Paul's name on them. Ron Paul's supporters leave standing room only because they want him as their President in 2008.
Do you think this kind of slander against people who support Ron Paul deserves a public apology?
Times report says:
"Only now the audience is packed with hundreds of kids in RON PAUL REVOLUTION T-shirts who go nuts — giving standing ovations when he drones on about getting rid of the Federal Reserve and returning to the gold standard."
Ron Paul does Not drone on!
They also are not calling him a Republican which he clearly is! He is one of the most conservative Republicans running for President!
Who owns stock in Time Magazine and paid for this poor excuse for a story?
2007-11-18 23:23:30 · 8 answers · asked by Naturescent 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Would Ron Paul supporters get by with calling Clinton and Obama supporters nerds? Does anyone deserve to be called a nerd because of who they support?
2007-11-18 23:29:42 · update #1
Ron Paul is the HOT ticket at present. Yes there is a fear from the ESTABLISHED that Ron Paul will win & "upset" their party! Ron Paul NEVER was a second tier candidate to begin with! Check out Ron paul on line at WIKIPEDIA. Check out his first presidential bid in 88'. He's much stronger now both in finances & voter support. Representative Paul is going to take it home BIG TIME!
2007-11-18 23:44:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
0 and he can help Obama be elected. the different difficulty to menion is which you're speaking approximately going from the severe left to the severe good and thats no longer a impressive indicator of unfastened will. this could be a reasonable usa and in basic terms each and every as quickly as in awhile does somebody from the extremes get elected. Obama is the main severe President maybe ever. Clinton became no longer a liberal, Bush became no longer a conservative. yet the two have been hated by applying the extremes of their very own events. in basic terms a reasonable, bipartisan President can prevail. Bush labored with a Dem Congress for 6 of the 8 yrs he became in workplace and all of what liberals call his evil deeds have been performed with the approval and investment of the Dem Congress. don't be a hater and don't enable human beings lead you to hate. the persons who stay on the political extremes are in basic terms bipolar haters and that facilitates no person. you haven't any longer any clue of what Ron Paul is approximately, and that i've got faith you do no longer know plenty approximately Obama the two. do no longer enable human beings, or enable your self be pulled into political extremes.
2016-10-17 06:22:51 · answer #2 · answered by bobbee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have to agree with Bill H. I'm on here a lot, and I constantly see Paul supporters putting questions on here, getting upset and calling every analyst and pundit a "conformist" just because he/she doesn't like Paul.
Face it, there are (what?) 15 other candidates; not EVERYBODY is going to like Paul. In most polls, he places darn near dead last. Money isn't everything. Every other candidate is heavily bashed by the media and other candidates. If Paul wants to be a MAJOR candidate, all of his supporters have to learn to take the heat.
No, nobody is "afraid" that Paul will win. I don't want him to win - I don't like his policies or political views - but don't assume that all of us who don't like Paul are scared and are trying to hide Paul. That's just silly.
2007-11-18 23:37:12 · answer #3 · answered by amg503 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Obviously, it's someone with incentives to stifle any voices that don't go with the current flow of things in this country.
Ron Paul is a true conservative, but almost nothing like a Republican, in terms of what Republicans really are nowadays.
Big government Democrats and big government Republicans are in bed together. They want us to keep bickering about the ultimately irrelevant topics so that they can retain their delicate power balance. As soon as someone comes forward touting the actual values on which our country was built, that is perceived as a threat to BOTH sides, and therefore even the liberal TIME magazine will start publishing campaign materials.
2007-11-18 23:30:30 · answer #4 · answered by Buying is Voting 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
This is nothing new, it happens all the time. Example: leftist and liberal outlets regularly miss quote or out right lie about things Bill O'Reilly says. I love it when he runs the sound bite in question, which clearly proves they ( liberal media) lies, and attempt to smear and give misinformation. Yes they are afraid...very afraid. They are pathetic.
2007-11-18 23:38:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ron Mall??
Whoever he is, Im sure the frontrunners lie awake at night wondering how they are ever going to get by Ron Saul, or sprawl. Whatever his name is.
2007-11-18 23:38:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I lke Ron Paul, but, he utterly has no chance of winning the nomination.
2007-11-18 23:26:52 · answer #7 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
GEE, Why Can't Paul supporters take it when a publication takes a critical look at their candidacy ?
2007-11-18 23:27:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋