English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Suppose everyone stops paying into social security and instead has funds deducted from their pay for universal health care. Many of the people currently paying into social security will recieve absolutely no benefit from it if they can't live long enough to collect it. Isn't your current health a bigger priority than your retirement? If you take an individualist standpoint on the issue of health care then I don't see why you would mind trading money given to the elderly and poor for money given to keep America's youth in the work force and contributing to society.

2007-11-18 23:06:57 · 6 answers · asked by illunatic 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

6 answers

In the end it doesn't really matter. Death comes to all.

2007-11-18 23:17:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well, what would be the use of living a long life if you were going to starve to death after you were too old to work? Why not just increase the amount deducted for social security to pay the cost of national health insurance. Run it like Medicare, with private doctors and hospitals, but no commercial health insurance companies--except for people who want to buy more coverage than the national program provides.

Like now, people on Medicare can buy extra insurance or prescription insurance if they want to, at their own expense. But basic health coverage is provided--and the government doesn't run it--it is actually operated by private companies so far as the bookkeeping is concerned.

That way, no one can use their connections to politicians to get more benefits than they deserve.

2007-11-18 23:19:43 · answer #2 · answered by gwhillikers2000 5 · 0 0

Impossible. You cannot refuse to pay Social Security tax. You cannot arbitrarily pay into a socialized medical plan that does not exist.
In the US, we do not need socialized medicine. People have health insurance. Everyone has access to health care. Pay for what you get. Don't try to rely on the government to take money from Peter to give to Paul.

2007-11-18 23:32:30 · answer #3 · answered by regerugged 7 · 0 0

it would desire to not artwork, it extremely is the reason. in case you have gotten a vital authority utility that's too low fee for combatants the competition will decrease. We see this with the US submit workplace vs united statesand FEDEX, they can not compete to mail letters once you think approximately that the US submit workplace is merely too low fee. 2nd the alternative considerable subject is that if the federal government wellbeing care plan is merely too low fee and it does not trip even from the persons paying into it. The tax payers will all be determining to purchase it, even those that have guy or woman wellbeing care on your plan. It got here approximately with social risk-free practices, and it will constantly ensue. inner maximum insurance companys would do reliable once you narrow back off Medicare/Medicaid. Medicare makes insurance companys not waiting to compete with the elderly, and medicaid makes it impossiable for insurance firms to have a low-priced once you think approximately that medicaid grants it for unfastened to the adverse. So insurance firms at recent can not have a low magnitude and are guessing what the magnitude is. Medicaid is the low type, and medicare kills their industry. Obama Care will merely preserve making guy or woman insurance firms much less aggressive once you think approximately that the pricing will probable be too low fee to compete in direction of.

2016-10-01 23:49:10 · answer #4 · answered by riva 4 · 0 0

well being that S .S. is a pay as you go program, if every one stopped paying, those who are collecting S.S. now would not get paid,.....there is no S.S. lock box,.....that is just a myth politicians talk about, it never happened, the S.S. money goes to the general fund and gets distributed from there,.....

2007-11-19 00:23:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Don't think that will ever happen.

2007-11-18 23:11:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers