Traditionally you don't skip a generation, but you can still continue it. There's no law against it!
My baby is taking my husband's first name, but not middle. We will still think of him as a junior when he really isn't since the middle name is different.
2007-11-18 21:31:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Karla 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Absolutely it can. The II and all is just about being the next one in line.
2007-11-19 07:08:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by pattyaq7 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would not do this only bc people are going to think his father was the II.
2007-11-19 09:36:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dani 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes if the father is not the III then he will be if named after the grandfather
2007-11-19 05:28:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by tasha t 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
yes. like royalty, Elizabeth I is quite a distant relative to Elizabeth II. so why not?
2007-11-19 05:49:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jesusa 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think so. I know a "third" whose father was not the "second" or "junior."
2007-11-19 15:41:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by amethyst-ran 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The son would be the third and the grandson would be the fourth
2007-11-19 05:22:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Yes, it's possible.
2007-11-19 05:41:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Best 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would think it would start at "I" again.
2007-11-19 09:22:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by JennyJenJen 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course it can.
2007-11-19 09:11:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by That_ blue_ eyed_ Irish_ lass 6
·
0⤊
0⤋