English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who would win?

What would the score be?

Could the game easily go either way?

How many starting positions would the Patriots have a better player at, how many equal?

I actually think the Patriots could win since they play together more and are superior at some key positions, plus many of the best non-Patriots are not in the NFC.

2007-11-18 17:38:20 · 18 answers · asked by Marc C 2 in Sports Football (American)

18 answers

Before the 1967 expansion, the NHL allstar game was the Stanley Cup winner vs. the allstars of the rest of the league, but the Stanley Cup winner almost always won. The cohesion and teamwork of a group of players who know a system and drill it week after week would mean that the Patriots would win. So might any other team. But even more so a dominant team like the Patriots.

2007-11-18 17:46:57 · answer #1 · answered by mattapan26 7 · 2 1

Pro Bowl teams generally aren't as good as a powerful team in the regular season. The pro bowl and other all-star games are just a showcase of talent and are designed purely for entertainment. A team that's trained and played together for weeks like the Patriots would easily beat any pro bowl team which may have the talent but lacks team chemistry like the Pats. And the NFC just isn't that good player-wise, at least not better than the Patriots in key positions.

2007-11-18 17:56:27 · answer #2 · answered by liuxuande 4 · 1 0

Based on the format the Patriots would win easily. The NFC has little time to prepare, and are on a semi vacation in Hawaii. The NFC's offense would struggle more than the defense. Look for a lot of turnovers by the NFC, and not much offense. The scoreline would read something like, Patriots 49-10 over the NFC.

2007-11-18 19:51:40 · answer #3 · answered by Waldo Waldo Waldo! 5 · 0 0

The patriots would win if their team was in the pro bowl because they have had a lot more practice as a team. The score would be 31-10. It wouldn't go either way because the patriots have more chemistry. The patriots would have a better quarterback and wide reciever in Brady and Moss. The patriots have a great o-line too.

2007-11-18 18:42:54 · answer #4 · answered by monomono4 2 · 0 0

You know, it used to be that the rest of the country hated the Yankees and their fans.

Now Boston fans make it just as easy to hate their teams equally.

The Patriots should win a few more games before you start getting giddy. In fact, how about winning the Super Bowl before you start crowing? When's the last time New England won? Indy, the Steelers... umm

2007-11-18 17:50:22 · answer #5 · answered by ironcityguy 5 · 3 0

No that would be a DULL game. It would be worse then the Patriots vs the Redskins was. We have gone over this before, Pro Bowl teams don't have time to work together. That is why they have specific rules for the Pro Bowl.

2016-05-24 03:51:19 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

The Patriots would win a close one probably like 45-35.
Pro bowl teams dont spend that much time together and therefore dont know plays as well.

2007-11-18 18:01:48 · answer #7 · answered by walter shavens 2 · 0 0

QB the pats have the best player. The rest are = or worse. It all depends on who coaches the NFC team, whether or not the team is put together with scheme in mind, and how long they have to practice. If just thrown together with a week or less to practice, the pats would win.

2007-11-18 17:58:54 · answer #8 · answered by blibityblabity 7 · 0 0

Pats 42 NFC 17

2007-11-18 21:27:41 · answer #9 · answered by B M 2 · 0 0

I've gone to a Pro Bowl game before, and I can tell you that no one plays hard. Therefore, I pick the Pats with a score of 7 to28.

2007-11-18 17:53:38 · answer #10 · answered by Julie 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers