Does our MLK national holiday honor- the agenda of our current civil rights leaders or Dr King's message?

Question

I am a little confused over the MLK holiday; when I think of Dr King, I think of his message, God's message- to bring people together, foregiveness, healing wounds and accepting others who are different.

Our civil rights leaders, Sharpton and Jackson, pervert Dr King's message with race baiting, personally gaining power & money by exploiting victims, a partnership with the socialist element of liberalism and an absolute agenda to prevent healing, to prevent racial harmony and pour fuel on the fire of racial discord. Jackson and Sharpton are the antithesis of Dr King's message, this is undeniable.

Should a true follower of Dr King's message, attempt to speak and attempt to bring Dr King's message to all people, who would his opponents be?

Hopefully, someone's eyes will be opened from this question.

Think about who would betray, attack, demean, dig up dirt, disparage- a sincere and honest messenger of Dr King's message?

To the silly liberal- Jackson was a rival to King. When Dr King was killed, Jackson rushed to the balcony (he was at the ground level) and spread Dr King's blood on his clothing, so he could tell the media, he cradled Dr King in his arms when he died. Dr Abernathy and other civil rights leaders have confirmed Jackson's actions.

Here's what you liberals don't get- we honor Dr King's message; look how shameless his family has acted since he died, just like Jessie and other corrupt opportunists.

Answer 1

Peace to you, SJK! If you wonder how MLK's murder might have assisted "political development," recall how the unpopular, dictatorial Civil Rights Bill of 1968 had lost most of its steam in the House of Representatives during March 1968. Reps are closer to the people than Senators, and the people (both) black and white clearly didn't want this legislation. Suddenly, King is shot. Six days later the bill sweeps through the House 249 to 171. "King's death immediately realigns forces on both sides," noted TIME in its April 19 issue. Remember Professor Richard Fagen: "Individuals, groups, organizations, and the mass media are all linked together and all interact in the political process... the death of kings occasion a great deal of communication.."

The 1968 Civil Rights Act had little to do with racial dignity and equality. Knowledgeable black leaders saw through it. "This is a hoax on the black people," snarled Roy Innis, then associate director of the Council on Racial Equality (TIME, p.20). What did the Act do? It transformed a sack of potatoes into a federal puree. Federal credit would increase expotentially, sucking millions into usurious witchcraft contracts. The most insidious result, of course, would be the literal handcuffing of local destinies to federal police, which is seen today in the American flag armpatches worn by local law enforcement officers, signalling the formation of a federal police-force more respectful of appointed officials in Washington than elected representatives from the neighborhood.

Reflect on American life since the murder of MLK:
- the increased controls and loss of individual freedom
- the proportionate increase in depression and suicide
- the increase in missing and violated children
- in the elevation of blasphemy and perversion to respectability
- in high-handed bureaucratic harrassment
- in alcohol and drug dependency (mostly pharmas)
- in domestic bloodshed
- in economic miseries
- in political assassinations and imprisonments
- in religious/governmental persecutions

How many millions of babies have been sacrificed by their mothers to the gods of time and money since the warlocks took King?

If MLK gave his life for this, his memory should be cursed. Yes, and if his memory is enshrined in a FEDERAL HOLIDAY and celebrated by the lying rulers and wicked servants who killed him it IS cursed. Because it is not King's life they celebrate, but his DEATH. King's death is their handiwork, and they display it proudly. And all who honor it are lie-believers drinking the blood of the black mass.

Many graves are filled with bodies that died for Satan, but King's is NOT one of them. I cannot view or read the speech he made on the eve of his assassination without feeling that unmistakable elation that comes only from the Holy Spirit:

.."And then I got into Memphis. And some began to... talk about the threats.. .Or what would happen to me from some of our sick white brothers. But I don't know what will happen now. We've got some difficult days ahead. But it really doesn't matter with me now, because I've been to the mountaintop, and I don't mind. Like anybody, I would like to live a long life, longevity has its grace. But I'm not concerned about that now. I just want to do God's Will. And He's allowed me to go up to the mountain. And I have looked over, and I've seen the promised land."

This passage convinces me that between April 3 and April 4, Martin Luther King Jr. became a fully repented man, a true brother in Christ. Why do I believe that? Because the tone, strength, confidence, and faith expressed in that last speech were those of a man who had recently said "NO" to Satan, and was resigned to the consequences. "No" to what, I can't say. But we know that King, like Kennedy, had turned against the war in Vietnam, a war extremely profitable to interests that employ off-duty CIA men, and over 30% of the U.S. soldiers there were black. He was just beginning to speak out about inflation and (Federal Reserve) monetary manipulation, a measure which could have damaged the money-demon's spell on the people. Whether Satan in the form of a high official offered King protections in exchange for silence in these matters, or whether an outright threat was made, we may never know. But the April 3 speech is a report that Satan had been negatived.

In the film clip, you perceive that King is feeling a unique combination of stress and joy. His face glows with perspiration, the kind that was shed in the Garden of Gethsemane, when the enormity of one's committment to God was ultimately realized. After a Gethsemane crisis, death is inconsequential. You've been to the mountain and looked over. You've confessed and been forgiven. You've been invited to enter the Kingdom, and now that you understand eternity you know you can't tell the people everything. They will learn what you know in time, in time.

And Satan nailed King, expecting to accomplish great evil with the death and aftermath: turning all non-whites against the descendant of an ancient white family, winning silent cheers from resentful whites long convicted of God's judgment for vexing the ***** strangers, and stimulating more complex "interaction" among the people to necessitate the imposition of more services, more controls, more chains, more whips.

The King and Kennedy brothers' assassinations have taught us that covert action governments, ruling in darkness, are not interested in truth. How many of the politicians and journalists you trust informed you that shortly after the death of JFK, the CIA established a domestic operations office at 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, exactly one block from LBJ's White House? The cover name for these HQ's was "The U.S. Army Element, Joint Planning Activity, Joint Operations Group (507253). Was this group involved in planning the violence and riots that ended in the death of Mr. King and the final imposition of the Communist Manifesto upon the U.S. Constitution? Was the plot to tail James Ray in 1967 from St. Louis to Montreal and take control of him with promises of wealth and freedom, eventually to leave him an unwitting PATSY for a murder he had no idea would be committed - was this plot nurtured and hatched by the St. Louis field office of the FBI under the direction of agent William Webster, who later as Judge Webster desperately tyrannized James Ray in order to keep the plot from dematerializing in the light of truth? Amazing how Webster later became nominated as Director of the CIA.

Your question is very good! But these questions are not likely to be answered too publicly. They won't even be asked in TIME or LIFE, or on a major TV network, or wherever the truth in men can be compromised by the CIA's generosity with cash or special favors. The task of the 4th branch of - unelected, unresponsive, non-constitutional, noble and arrogant - is not truth but political development, which today means dangling bright objects before the eyes of the people, maintaining the spell.

- F.T.S.

Answer 2

Sharpton and Jackson were key players in 1960s civil rights movement and marched side by side with King. Had there not been a death, you'd probably have mentioned King in your tirade.

Answer 3

John McCain became seen an somewhat "Conservative" republican who alongside with different "conservatives on the time did no longer help any legislations dealing with civil rights. those secure the previous due Jesse Helms, and Richard Byrd. while that kind of "Conservative" politics fell out of fashion, because of the republican social gathering dating the "evangelical vote" he had to alter. Chris, you may desire to study up on your history. all of us is easily-known with that Lincoln did no longer help liberating slaves till the north began to lose the war, and then it became on condition that they might serve interior the army (he mandatory the manpower) climate McCain is a racist or no longer, i myself do no longer care, as with somebody that feels that way. that's there burden to hold (I truthfully have seen them stand in a protracted line on the food market because of the fact they did no longer prefer reachable money to the "black" cashier, who had a shorter line)

Answer 4

MLK did drugs, had prostitutes privately brought in, and he wasn't even actually a 'doctor', OR a 'reverend'.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
MLK Day is a joke. The only reason it exists is to placate the NAACP and it's followers.