http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/06/AR2007030602020_pf.html
A bipartisan investigation by the Senate intelligence committee subsequently established that all of these claims were false -- and that Mr. Wilson was recommended for the Niger trip by Ms. Plame, his wife. When this fact, along with Ms. Plame's name, was disclosed in a column by Robert D. Novak, Mr. Wilson advanced yet another sensational charge: that his wife was a covert CIA operative and that senior White House officials had orchestrated the leak of her name to destroy her career and thus punish Mr. Wilson.
The partisan furor over this allegation led to the appointment of special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald. Yet after two years of investigation, Mr. Fitzgerald charged no one with a crime for leaking Ms. Plame's name.
2007-11-18 12:14:57 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
"The trial has provided convincing evidence that there was no conspiracy to punish Mr. Wilson by leaking Ms. Plame's identity -- and no evidence that she was, in fact, covert." -Washington Post
2007-11-18 12:15:43 · update #1
I cited an editorial from a liberal newspaper. Read the entire bipartisan senate intelligence report (if you can handle reading many pages detailing how the Wilsons lied).
2007-11-18 12:24:02 · update #2
I cited an editorial from a liberal newspaper. Read the entire bipartisan senate intelligence report (if you can handle reading many pages detailing how the Wilsons lied).
2007-11-18 12:24:36 · update #3
Valerie and Joe Wilson are rank opportunistic liars. I hope they choke on their ill gotten gains.
2007-11-18 12:23:31 · answer #1 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 5⤊ 6⤋
I've always wondered how "outing" a 9-5 desk jockey worked? It's not like the guy sitting next to her didn't know she was there?
2007-11-18 20:29:09 · answer #2 · answered by Mark A 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Who? All the anti-President Bush drones. All the anti-war crunches. All liberals (including Obama). All socialists (including Hillary). Most Dem's.
2007-11-18 20:25:34 · answer #3 · answered by Mother 6 · 6⤊ 4⤋
Since when did opinion pages become 'proof'? Try looking a little harder, like actually reading all the documents from the hearing. You can use the link below.
2007-11-18 20:20:48 · answer #4 · answered by Paul B 4 · 7⤊ 5⤋
Not me. But it appears Chi Guy drinks from that cup of Kool Aid.
2007-11-18 20:29:01 · answer #5 · answered by Cinner 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
I believe you cited an editorial.
2007-11-18 20:20:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
They do for sure
2007-11-18 20:49:50 · answer #7 · answered by charlie s 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋