2007-11-18 11:57:03 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
neither
Bush claimed to be but look what that got us, he turned into our "decider".
Hillary is polarizing but a lot of that is her last name and the fact she is a woman.
she has political views that many may support but never even hear because she is a Clinton or because she is a woman.
2007-11-18 12:12:03 · answer #1 · answered by michr 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush is the biggest divider I have known. Not sure about Hillary, but politics seems very divided these days. I AM tired of this "us" vs. "them" attitude.
2007-11-18 12:22:39 · answer #2 · answered by Gaia 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush is a uniter to a fault with his ill conceived new tone.
Hillary is purely a divider and the Democrat party is composed almost entirely of divided loyalties, coalitions and special interest groups.
2007-11-18 12:01:56 · answer #3 · answered by bravozulu 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Saddam replace into permitting UN infinite and unsupervised get get admission to to on the time. The UN voted against the U. S. invasion. He planned to invade Iraq long in the previous 9-11 ever befell. he's a liar.
2016-12-09 01:17:46 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, neither. They are both HIGHLY divisive and NOT within mainstream America's ideal of a "uniter".
2007-11-18 12:06:20 · answer #5 · answered by HP 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
PRESIDENT George W. Bush, bar none!!!
2007-11-18 12:27:03 · answer #6 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Boy, that's a good question. I don't think I have ever seen two more polarizing politicians with significant support as those two.
2007-11-18 12:01:09 · answer #7 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hillary is the most polarizing figure in American political history.
FACT
2007-11-18 12:00:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋